No-Spread, or No-Recoil? (reposted & forgot poll cuz im retarded)
Okay, so my entire thread was rolled back, and 10 of my posts (i'm a noob again! Agh!)
So, lets start off with this poll (once again.)
I prefer no-spread or both because i want the bullet to hit the exact spot i aim at, i can handle the gun inertia.
I had this great idea for Dave though, you could put both options in, but only one can be activated, e.g. you turn on no-spread, but no-recoil turns off, it gives people a choice between what they want, and it doesn't make the VIP worth less.
EDIT: AW shit i forgot to put a poll, whatever just put what u prefer.
1. no recoil
2. no spread
5. both (inter-changeable) [I explained what i mean by that in the above post.]
SO, if dave ever gets a chance to read this thread, i hope he puts inter-changeable in. It doesn't reduce the value of the VIP, because only 1 of the 2 may be enabled at once, and people get a chance to feel what both hacks are like.
what is the big difference between no recoil and no spread I dont see much difference
No spread: the bullet hits the exact place u aim at
No recoil: stops the guns movement while firing.
EDIT: so basically, if you have no-spread, the bullets shoot on the spot every time, but the gun moves you upward so the aim is moving up. If you have no recoil, the gun is just stopped at the position u have it firing at, and the bullets spread around that area.
no spread is useless with no recoil.. <<<no recoil stops gun from moving around alot>>> but <<<no spread makes then gun shoot in same place>>>
The two things are completely different, and are quite useful with or without each-other. no-spread is better if u have a low accuracy but low-no recoil weapon. no-recoil is better for the heavier guns that are accurate but have alot of recoil.
Imagine you have no recoil, the gun shoots at the same area but the bullets spread out.
Now, imagine you have no spread, the gun shoots and it moves upward gradually, but the bullet hits the exact middle of the crosshair every time.