Battlefiled 3 vs Call Of Duty Mw 3

[hussi]

both are goods uh yeah

[DreamMaker]

True, but even if one person reads it and they change there opinion because of what I wrote then it was well worth it.

You'r right!

---------- Post added at 01:38 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:36 PM ----------

both are goods uh yeah

I play both and I can say that:BF3 is very realistic and is all about WORKTEAM always. MW3 is more "fun" because is a arcade more shooter and you will say u have more fun but i am not sure is true.

[Noovaa]

I tend to have more fun with BF3, but that's just my opinion.

[lulzmans]

I have fun with both games. MW3 is easier, BF3 is more real (i like real) I proudly own both of them and play both on a daily basis but really what is this thread but splitting hairs. A game is a game why choose?

Anyways, everyone has there own opinion and this thread does nothing but make people argue over something that is almost pointless.
There both fun and if you bought both why not just agree (because you played em if your commenting on here) that they both spark interest in your gaming style.

[freehuntx]

Battlefield 3 = Too much Camper
MW3 = More Rusher + Skill

0:1 BF3 - MW3


Battlefield 3 = Bigger Maps
MW3 = Small Maps

1:1 BF3 - MW3


Battlefield 3 = No Killstreaks
MW3 = Killstreaks

1:2 BF3 - MW3

naaah MW3 is 1000x better

[lulzmans]

Battlefield 3 = Too much Camper
MW3 = More Rusher + Skill

0:1 BF3 - MW3


Battlefield 3 = Bigger Maps
MW3 = Small Maps

1:1 BF3 - MW3


Battlefield 3 = No Killstreaks
MW3 = Killstreaks

1:2 BF3 - MW3

naaah MW3 is 1000x better

people camp in mw3 too and who gets "kill streaks" in real life? battlefield is about realism. In mw3 you get to call in the heli in bf3 you get to be the heli.

your comparing "real" with "really fake" both games are just as good as the next the only reason mw3 did so good is cus of fan boys cant get over the same thing that mw2 was about. Ive played all the cod and battlefield games. there both good since the beginning and really they both haven't changed that much since ether game has started. (exception is graphics because battlefield 3 blows mw3 out of the water) when call of duty steps it up and your able to drive vehicles fly planes and still have all of there game modes and step up there graphics it will be better. but for now because mw3 has all them game modes it makes it fun. If battlefield had "search and destroy" on there game list it would be bad ass but it doesn't because it would be to unrealistic.

But im rambling now xD if anything by gaming standards BF3 is better because of improved graphics(best out there right now in my mind) but they fail in game modes So in my conclusion there both equal.

[Noovaa]

Battlefield 3 = Too much Camper
MW3 = More Rusher + Skill

0:1 BF3 - MW3

Wrong, MW3 has noob camping in small maps, in BF3 you have to camp, because if you run outside of cover you get your head blown off. Plus we had already discussed BF3 and MW3 take different skill sets to play.

Correction - 1:0 BF3 - MW3


Battlefield 3 = Bigger Maps
MW3 = Small Maps

1:1 BF3 - MW3

Can't argue with that.

Correction - 2:0 BF3 - MW3


Battlefield 3 = No Killstreaks
MW3 = Killstreaks

1:2 BF3 - MW3

If you even played BF3 you would know there is kill streaks in the form of nemesis, revenge and others.

Correction - 2:0 BF3 - MW3 (Score stays the same.)


Battlefield 3 = Better graphics.
MW3 = Shit graphics.

3:0 BF3 - MW3


Battlefield 3 = More mature player-base.
MW3 = Adolescent player-base.

4:0 BF3 - MW3


Battlefield 3 = Better gameplay. (Tactical, strategical, analytical, teambased, ext.)
MW3 = Rambo idiocy.

5:0 BF3 - MW3

---------------------------------------------

I could go on but there really isn't a point, MW3 is clearly outclassed by the superiority that is Battlefield, going above and beyond the call.

[Snowbrdd]

Well the tanks are rambo idiocy people who just camp in it.

[lulzmans]

Battlefield 3 = Too much Camper
MW3 = More Rusher + Skill

0:1 BF3 - MW3

Wrong, MW3 has noob camping in small maps, in BF3 you have to camp, because if you run outside of cover you get your head blown off. Plus we had already discussed BF3 and MW3 take different skill sets to play.

Correction - 1:0 BF3 - MW3


Battlefield 3 = Bigger Maps
MW3 = Small Maps

1:1 BF3 - MW3

Can't argue with that.

Correction - 2:0 BF3 - MW3


Battlefield 3 = No Killstreaks
MW3 = Killstreaks

1:2 BF3 - MW3

If you even played BF3 you would know there is kill streaks in the form of nemesis, revenge and others.

Correction - 2:0 BF3 - MW3 (Score stays the same.)


Battlefield 3 = Better graphics.
MW3 = Shit graphics.

3:0 BF3 - MW3


Battlefield 3 = More mature player-base.
MW3 = Adolescent player-base.

4:0 BF3 - MW3


Battlefield 3 = Better gameplay. (Tactical, strategical, analytical, teambased, ext.)
MW3 = Rambo idiocy.

5:0 BF3 - MW3

---------------------------------------------

I could go on but there really isn't a point, MW3 is clearly outclassed by the superiority that is Battlefield, going above and beyond the call.

I agree 98% but the Nemisis thing e.e all you really get is a ribbon and a few extra points not really a killstreak. Killstreaks are dumb anyways in mw3

Well the tanks are rambo idiocy people who just camp in it.

Agreed yesterday i was playing a 2 on 1 game i was the 1 they and the two assholes were flying in a helli xD needless to say it wasnt easy to kill em since i dont have anything laser guided yet. (just started playing) but they were dumb and let me take all the points before they went flying around trying to take em all back. They landed on the ground to take points then and yeah....so easy then xD killed both of em multiple times.

[Noovaa]

I agree 98% but the Nemisis thing e.e all you really get is a ribbon and a few extra points not really a killstreak. Killstreaks are dumb anyways in mw3



Agreed yesterday i was playing a 2 on 1 game i was the 1 they and the two assholes were flying in a helli xD needless to say it wasnt easy to kill em since i dont have anything laser guided yet. (just started playing) but they were dumb and let me take all the points before they went flying around trying to take em all back. They landed on the ground to take points then and yeah....so easy then xD killed both of em multiple times.

They are killsteak bonuses though, so they do count. I don't really care about killsteaks but to the original poster of that charts logic, killsteaks is an important part of the game.

[freehuntx]

There are so much Differences between this 2 Games, so its not possible to tell which game is better.
Lets say it this way.

For ME Mw3 is better, because everyone have the same chances.
In BF3 a good Dogfighter is god.
I was in a Map, there was a good pilot on other Team.
He got like 2 deaths, and 140 Kills just by using Jet.

[Noovaa]

There are so much Differences between this 2 Games, so its not possible to tell which game is better.
Lets say it this way.

For ME Mw3 is better, because everyone have the same chances.
In BF3 a good Dogfighter is god.
I was in a Map, there was a good pilot on other Team.
He got like 2 deaths, and 140 Kills just by using Jet.

A "good" dogfighter has spent hours practicing in a jet, so he should be able to beat noobs that just run into a jet wanting something different and dieing when they don't know how to properly dogfight.

Thanks for sharing your opinion, we all really do appreciate it (No sarcasm.) But your logic is very flawed. In MW3 you can't go into a jet to dogfight, because there are none. You can't go into a tank, a car, a helicopter, an AAV. Battlefield 3 has all of those, plus they still do a better job with infantry combat then MW3, a game that revolves around it.

Really, the only people that like MW3 more are people with COD fanboy friends.

[Snowbrdd]

Good dogfighter means nothing to a squad with 4 anti air launchers and a anti air vehicle.

[iTzSeyeko™JR #1]

Alright, if you want a War Game simulator; go for BF3.If you want a game with 13 year old fags running around whining then go for MW3 as well as the CoD franchise.
'Nuff said.

[lulzmans]

They are killsteak bonuses though, so they do count. I don't really care about killsteaks but to the original poster of that charts logic, killsteaks is an important part of the game.

ahhh i suppose so cus of the extra points it gives you for this