# Thread: Physics Based. Fuck all off all you others. No flame please cunts!

1. ## Physics Based. Fuck all off all you others. No flame please cunts!

This is to do with the implementation of centripetal motion in relation to a medieval trebuchet design.

It is just a standard gravity powered trebuchet.

Question 1:

What would be the best way to find the initial velocity of the projectile, using simple camera etc?

Question 2:

Also is anyone able to explain how centripetal acceleration and angular velocity is related to the counter-weight trebuchet design?

Question 3:

If the velocity doesn't change due to an increase in mass, how does the projectile travel further due to an increase in counter-weight mass? It doesn't make sense because the kinetic does not change, yet the potential energy must change due to P.E = mass x gravity x height.

3. No an assignment bro.

4. Originally Posted by Sals
No an assignment bro.
Oh. Well at least we know now.

5. Assignment was to design a a medieval trebuchet, record data etc.

And improve the design.

This is a uni assignment so please leave spam out of it

6. Ok noob listen up. Here's how it works.

Consider your trebuchet as 2 parts: mass, and arm (the shit that throws the projectile).
When you drop the mass, energy from the mass you lifted will go into 2 places:
1) it will go into the kinetic energy of the mass itself.
2) it will go into the kinetic energy of the arm+projectile (angular velocity).

It's not hard to figure out how much energy goes into each one unless you suck dick at math. Of course, the total energy must add up to the initial potential energy of your mass minus friction bullshit (which you can neglect because it is small).
To figure this out, you need to look at your drawing and find the moment of inertia of your arm+projectile (which isn't hard to do unless u suck dick at math).

easy ass problem

7. Do your own homework and actually learn something.

8. Having someone explain how to do a problem doesn't mean you aren't learning anything...

9. Sorry bruz. But neither of thoughs were what we are looking for.

And again @Supreme

Fuckhead it is not homework. It is part of our final assignment for physics.

The problem is we have kinetic energy and potential energy, the mathematics isn't the problem. It is the logic behind it.

@joblo150

10. Originally Posted by Sals
Sorry bruz. But neither of thoughs were what we are looking for.

And again @Supreme

Fuckhead it is not homework. It is part of our final assignment for physics.

The problem is we have kinetic energy and potential energy, the mathematics isn't the problem. It is the logic behind it.

@joblo150
Homework= Assignment same shit

11. Originally Posted by joblo150
Ok noob listen up. Here's how it works.

Consider your trebuchet as 2 parts: mass, and arm (the shit that throws the projectile).
When you drop the mass, energy from the mass you lifted will go into 2 places:
1) it will go into the kinetic energy of the mass itself.
2) it will go into the kinetic energy of the arm+projectile (angular velocity).

It's not hard to figure out how much energy goes into each one unless you suck dick at math. Of course, the total energy must add up to the initial potential energy of your mass minus friction bullshit (which you can neglect because it is small).
To figure this out, you need to look at your drawing and find the moment of inertia of your arm+projectile (which isn't hard to do unless u suck dick at math).

easy ass problem
/swag .

12. Originally Posted by Supreme

Homework= Assignment same shit
Well it clearly isn't

In uni/college you don't get homework.

So they are completely different
@Supreme

13. Originally Posted by Sals
Well it clearly isn't

In uni/college you don't get homework.

So they are completely different
@Supreme
ye u do dumbfuck it's usually 1/5th of the final grade.