Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 27 of 27
  1. #16
    PashaAmd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Gender
    male
    Posts
    1,014
    Reputation
    58
    Thanks
    224
    Quote Originally Posted by AVGN View Post
    dave uses themida
    i used themida and it d/c'd i used a different packer....didn't d/c

  2. #17
    S0aD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Gender
    male
    Posts
    2,250
    Reputation
    5
    Thanks
    589
    Themida is a God Packer...

  3. #18
    Departure's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Gender
    male
    Posts
    818
    Reputation
    125
    Thanks
    1,785
    My Mood
    Doh
    Themida use to be a good packer, but latest ollydebug scripts unpacks this in seconds...

    Also you have to remember what a packers is, it compress's the code for portability right... but once its executed the full size and original code is still in memory, which if memory scanning detection is used will still detect the same thing, Themida uses stolen bytes along with many other methods to avoid ripping which makes this more of a protector like VMProtect, which creates a fake environment to execute the code(very similar to google chrome) the down fall is it requires much more memory as opposed to NOT packing/protecting the exe, so while you have a smaller exe on disk it will occupie a lot more memory space. instead of packing/protecting why dont you research some anti debug methods if you that concerned about people ripping your addresses.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Departure For This Useful Post:

    markoj (05-17-2011)

  5. #19
    PashaAmd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Gender
    male
    Posts
    1,014
    Reputation
    58
    Thanks
    224
    @Departure
    can you help me? I tried using PESpin but I got this error
    [!] Error: Invalid PE32+ File
    I have the x64 version on my x64 bit os

  6. #20
    NOOB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Gender
    male
    Posts
    3,863
    Reputation
    425
    Thanks
    8,598
    Why would you pack public code anyways?

  7. #21
    PashaAmd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Gender
    male
    Posts
    1,014
    Reputation
    58
    Thanks
    224
    remember that one kid that hex edited it and tried to pass it off as his own? made me mad.

  8. #22
    LionelMessi10's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Gender
    male
    Location
    MPGH.NET
    Posts
    6,125
    Reputation
    114
    Thanks
    4,545
    My Mood
    Aggressive
    Hex edit ? lol

    Encrypt all strings

  9. #23
    PashaAmd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Gender
    male
    Posts
    1,014
    Reputation
    58
    Thanks
    224
    i hate xor.... );

  10. #24
    User1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Gender
    female
    Location
    Above the influence
    Posts
    4,085
    Reputation
    61
    Thanks
    4,294,967,295
    My Mood
    Crappy
    Make the code impossible to read.
    Any donations would help


    Quote Originally Posted by Bombsaway707

    HOLY SHIT ITS USER1
    Quote Originally Posted by Blood

    HOLY SHIT ITS USER1
    Quote Originally Posted by Alby-kun


    HOLY SHIT ITS USER1
    Quote Originally Posted by Ali

    HOLY SHIT ITS USER1
    Quote Originally Posted by CodeDemon
    HOLY SHIT ITS USER1
    Quote Originally Posted by Jussofresh View Post
    HOLY SHIT ITS USER1!
    [21:13] CoderNever: HOLY SHIT ITS USER1!
    Yes it is me... Yup Yup




  11. #25
    Decoder back's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Gender
    male
    Posts
    197
    Reputation
    28
    Thanks
    112
    Quote Originally Posted by supercarz1991 View Post
    Why pack it when its unpackable too? Someone who is.determined enough will find a way...its a computer, everything can be reveresed
    well ,use methods for encrypt your source code , but almost packers sucks..

    that's all problem.

    if u really want to protect the hack you'll need to know alot of knwoledge at ASM or something.

  12. #26
    Departure's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Gender
    male
    Posts
    818
    Reputation
    125
    Thanks
    1,785
    My Mood
    Doh
    Quote Originally Posted by PashaAmd View Post
    @Departure
    can you help me? I tried using PESpin but I got this error
    [!] Error: Invalid PE32+ File
    I have the x64 version on my x64 bit os
    Thats because your dll has been compiled as 32bit so you will need to use the 32bit version


    Guys honestly you don't need a packer to make your shit undetected, packers are only good for files on disk not getting detected but the same bytes are unpacked into memory as the original so for memory detection a packer wont do shit, this is also know as "Runtime Detection" there are many other custom things you can do to make your shit undetected and stay undetected for along time(depending on how well spread your hack is). I will make a topic soon explaining some ideas you can use to get your shit undetected without any use of a packer.. OR double packing which made me laugh..
    Last edited by Departure; 04-13-2011 at 07:19 PM.

  13. #27
    freedompeace's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Gender
    female
    Posts
    3,035
    Reputation
    340
    Thanks
    2,784
    My Mood
    Sad
    Quote Originally Posted by Decoder back View Post
    well ,use methods for encrypt your source code , but almost packers sucks..

    that's all problem.

    if u really want to protect the hack you'll need to know alot of knwoledge at ASM or something.
    Packers don't encrypt source code, they make it smaller ! Hence, "pack"ing (tighter), not encrypting.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12