Call of Duty is more of a arcade shooter and some people think its more fast-paced, some don't. It has smaller maps then Battlefield. Its not very realistic. Most call of duty games will last you 3-6 months.
Battlefield has bigger maps and is more realistic and you can destroy the maps unlike Call of Duty where they are already destroyed when you spawn. It has bigger maps and vehicles. Its a realistic type of FPS. Not to forget vehicles.
BF 3 is better, my opinion because the MW games don't look so realistic has BF ones, also driving the helicopter and crashing it against people makes me ROFL all the time in BF 2 >, has @B4M said COD for single player and BF for Multi player, --BF needs more team tactic than solo tactics, even for snipers cause they are the ones who paint the camping enemies all around the map ^_^ plus the bullets are affected by gravity lol
"Try and fail, but do not fail to try" - i forgot who said this :/
"I have not failed, i just found 10,000 ways not to do it" - Thomas Edison
The Following User Says Thank You to ruisu For This Useful Post:
vechicles 4 me its not a thing to argue, yes makes the game more realistic and cooler but i think that cod has more action i haven't seen a nuke go off in high altitude making a emp in bf but basally i think cod is better cuz it haz more adrenaline on it but the thing to get the killstreaks get us mad. From 0 to 10 i give cod 11 and bf 10
Middleman since: April 13th, 2011
Marketplace minion since: April 18th, 2011
Runescape minion since: June 6th, 2011
Moderator since: September 28th, 2011
General Moderator since: November 2nd, 2011
Global Moderator since: April 29th, 2012
Super User since: November 1st, 2013