First of the graphics are BETTER on MW3 , what ever they say BF3 looks good ,but motion blur is through the roof, gameplay sucks as hell ,you can`t shoot anyone ,multiplayer is faaaaar from MW3 ... I play the game on a 2560x1600 so I can tell the diffrence! On BF3 you are like looking through a camera ,while in MW3 you look through the players eyes .BF3 is darker ,and on most of the campaign there is a big amount of shadows and light reflections , the graphics in detail just don`t cut it .On MW3 you have detail in small objects and weapons ,while having less in the far objects ,yet not loosing to the BF3. Just choosing BF3 cause it`s having "better" graphics and a "better" gameplay ? You suck as a gamer....
MW3 wins without any competition.The game has better grafics,gameplay and story...BF3 stands on BF2-s succes while MW3 is just the next step in COD.. MW3 is just better at everything in BF3 they tried to do the thing in MW3 with playing diffrent ppl ,yet it sucked ,theyh just can`t make it . I heard that sludgehammer is thinking of making MW4 ,depending on the succes of MW3
Better Graphics? Are you fucking RETARDED!? IW4 engine is based on the Quake3 Arena engine which came out in like 1999! And it's only DX9! You're either blind or elite fail.
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to HAXXXXXX For This Useful Post:
You cant Compare the two. They were made for two different types of gameplay. MW3 close quaters, BF3 is vehicles with no close quater maps. Only thing you can realy compare from the two is the graphics..
Leave no words unspoken and save regrets for the broken.
The Following User Says Thank You to xyddragon For This Useful Post: