Originally Posted by
PTMartin
The government, just like they regulate all other taxes and fees levied.
Nirvana fallacy. Look it up.
To pay for the wall. Illegals come here, take jobs from citizens, drive down wages, and send the money back to Mexico.
Last year, more than $120 billion was sent to Mexico. At 10% the wall is paid for in 10 years with just this source of income alone. Add in all the other ones and the wall is paid for in half that time or less, and annual maintenance is perpetually covered.
Let's make it more unattractive to come legally and illegally.
Apparently more so than you. Increased cost of imports = more competitive domestic goods = more demand = more jobs and higher wages for citizens.
Oops, you really didn't think it all through before starting the name calling, did you? The name calling is a sure sign you've lost the argument.
See the above. The foreign aid alone will cover the annual maintenance. The savings to the tax payers in illegal benefits and reduced crime alone will cover the annual maintenance. Funding the wall and maintaining the wall with no additional expense to the US tax payer is easily done.
No they don't. Does, "working under the table" mean anything to you? They do kick in a bit from sales taxes to the states, but add up the cost of crime, incarceration, free medical, and education, and it's a net loss by far.
Cheap labor = low wages. Perfect for big business. Not so good for for the wage earner.
Nirvana fallacy. Look it up.
Because they are the main source of illegal immigrants