useful strings

[supercarz1991]

These will only be useful to those with the classes, These were easy to find, i'm sure they aren't new, but someone might find em useful somewhere

CClientWeaponMgr::CanChangeToWeapon if (WMGR_INVALID_ID == nWeaponId) return false
CClientWeaponMgr::CanChangeToWeapon if (CWM_NO_WEAPON == iWeapon) return false
CClientWeaponMgr::CanChangeToWeapon if (!g_pPlayerStats->HaveWeapon(nWeaponId)) return false
CClientWeaponMgr::CanChangeToWeapon if (pWeapon->bNoSelect) return false
CClientWeaponMgr::CanChangeToWeapon if (g_pPlayerMgr->IsPlayerDead() || g_pPlayerMgr->IsSpectatorMode()) return false
seungho == CClientWeaponMgr::CanChangeToWeapon if (WMGR_INVALID_ID == nWeaponId) return false
=============   [ERROR]   ===================CClientWeaponMgr::ForceChangeWeapon() nWeaponIndex 
CClientWeaponMgr::ChangeWeapon() MISSION_DEADCAM_WEAPON <= nWeaponIndex : %d

if(!g_pGameClientShell || !g_pWeaponMgr->IsValidWeaponId(nWeaponId))
CCBAPlayerStats::UpdateAmmo if(!g_pLTClient || !g_pWeaponMgr)
CCBAPlayerStats::GetAmmoCount nAmmoIndex :  %d, m_pnAmmo : %p, IsValidAmmoId : %d
CCBAGameClientShell::Instance().GetLobbyServer().EquipWeaponReq(%d,%d,(EQUIP_TYPE)%d);
CClientWeapon::HandleVectorImpact() fDistChar : %f, fHitDistChar : %f
Perturb: C[%.2f] - Min[%d] Max[%d] Lerp[%.2f]

have fun, if they come into use, let me know

[J]

Yea, I've seen these before. They are just strings, they have no references I don't think. I'll keep this open to see what everyone else has to say

[supercarz1991]

thanks dude! i was thinking with classes, you could use those pretty easily...i mean really you could just figure out a WeaponID, this would be really useful

!g_pPlayerStats->HaveWeapon(nWeaponId)

Force nWeaponId to some number and it might have a weapon spawn like effect or somethin

[J]

thanks dude! i was thinking with classes, you could use those pretty easily...i mean really you could just figure out a WeaponID, this would be really useful

!g_pPlayerStats->HaveWeapon(nWeaponId)

Force nWeaponId to some number and it might have a weapon spawn like effect or somethin

Very impressed with your imagination. But as you can see by the "!" operator at the beginning of the line, this function, "g_pPlayerStats->HaveWeapon(nWeaponId)" has a return type of bool, meaning they are using it to this effect:

if player has the weapon with an id of nWeaponId, return true, else return false.

This function does nothing but tell whether or not the player has a certain weapon either equiped or in their pack. Can't tell from this.

[ISmokeWeedAmICoolNow]

Yea, I've seen these before. They are just strings, they have no references I don't think. I'll keep this open to see what everyone else has to say

they all have references and have proved useful in my reversing. durrrr

[J]

they all have references and have proved useful in my reversing. durrrr

Your so cool

[ZigZak]

Thanks, Offtopic lol @ jeff's siggie

[Noobsmacker]

THANKS BRO

[[MPGH]Flengo]

Thanks, wanna post some weapon ID's? xD

[LilGho$t]

Very impressed with your imagination. But as you can see by the "!" operator at the beginning of the line, this function, "g_pPlayerStats->HaveWeapon(nWeaponId)" has a return type of bool, meaning they are using it to this effect:

if player has the weapon with an id of nWeaponId, return true, else return false.

This function does nothing but tell whether or not the player has a certain weapon either equiped or in their pack. Can't tell from this.

So, edit the code to always return the bool as true. I know that's not the easiest but it should be possible.

[supercarz1991]

Thanks, wanna post some weapon ID's? xD

oh the shit i could post LOL its scarry

[[MPGH]Flengo]

oh the shit i could post LOL its scarry

Hmmm...I'm curious and wondering now.

Post it

And add me on MSN?

[supercarz1991]

hahaha i'll do it slowly, file by file XD

[Saltine]

So, edit the code to always return the bool as true. I know that's not the easiest but it should be possible.

Bro, all it does is check a variable and return the corresponding value. Making it true would do nothing for you...

[UnderAmour]

The variables are bad.