Combat Arms VS. A.V.A.

[JustinFatalx]

Im starting this topic to discuss which game is better. Also my idea's on each.

Combat Arms

Pro's

1. Love the shops
2. Love the maps and game modes.

Cons

1. Graphics should be A.V.A. Graphics
2. Gameplay should be A.V.A.

A.V.A.

Pro's

1. Great Graphics and Gameplay
2. Love the option to change classes In-Game.

Con's

1. Needs more Weapons and Customizations
2. Needs more Maps and Match Type's
3. Needs to work on Reducing Lag In-Game

----------------------------------------------------------------

Overall I love both games and I wish the 2 games would merge and make a whole new game with these changes.

[Czar]

Obviously CA.

[SmokeyBear]

If CA and AVA made a baby it would be WR

[SmartAlley]

Combat Arms fosho...

[BJIZZLE]

Defininatly CA

[Imperial Commando]

CA or gtfo

[Alby-kun]

Combat Arms for me :]

[Kevin Rudd]

COD 6

[omlan]

Combat arms has more more guns. Ava i personally like better. But if you dont play an fps game for like 2 days and then you start playing AVA you will love it. Their are small amounts of guns in ava which is actually a PRO. Because their arent a billion guns to chose from and for many fps players dats good

CA is fast paked actions AVA IS team work= pwnage. Oh even though ava has less guns. AVA GUNS WILL ALWAYS OWN.

EDIT: AVA GUNS CAN BE CUSTOMIZED WIDELY> YOU CAN ADD SUSPRESSORS CHANGE THE SCOPE> BARRELS>TRIGGERS>MAGAZINE>EVEN ON SNIPERS YOU CAN CHANGE SCOPES>AND MORE CRAP.

[greathamza]

CA all the way

[omlan]

AVA plain and simple i cant bother typing..

[[MPGH]KING]

I hear AVA is full of hackers.

[JustinFatalx]

A.V.A. has maybe 10% hackers as Combat Arms has 80%.

[CRUSTY]

A.V.A. has maybe 10% hackers as Combat Arms has 80%.

My estimate is 25%...

[JustinFatalx]

You really think? It might have iv only played in the Starter Servers so far. Not sure if the Pro's use them.