Why do some polycheats get detected?

[[MPGH]T-800]

Use the search function and search for older poly hacks. Maybe it´s a assumption, but it's a fact that at this time all the poly hacks are dedected and it can´t be the signature method.

I know and you're correct. I had to end the converstion because he won't understand. Have a great day :^)

[antep2727]

I know and you're correct. I had to end the converstion because he won't understand. Have a great day :^)

We have no knowledge that vac ever used string detection. If they would, it would hit more ppl than just poly hacks.

I suggest you to read this : https://www.mpgh.net/forum/showthread.php?t=1083252

Explains quite well on how to trick VAC (well you must think a bit on your own).

If you want to make a pattern scanner to find a certain address in memory you will mostly use wildcards ('?').

In poly hacks we are using junk codes, mostly just the [add junk/] macro that will add 5 random variables.

So what will vac do? Easy, they will wildcard the places where the junkcodes are added ('? ? ? ? ?') and generate a signature.

But yes i dont understand. We have 100% proof that VAC uses signature based detection, just because someone think they used string detection doesnt mean vac did.

Atleast this is what i think. Even if they used string detection, we can easily change the strings.

[[MPGH]T-800]

K boss.

[Ally]

maybe because outdated

[Mexor]

maybe because outdated

Nope because by the time of the dedections the hacks are up to date.

[inc3pt]

Maybe because is just a "string detection"

So changing the string names, should make it "safer"?

[WildAssassinz]

So changing the string names, should make it "safer"?

That doesnt do anything...

[inc3pt]

That doesnt do anything...

I didn't ask you kid

[antep2727]

So changing the string names, should make it "safer"?

atm there is no real proof that vac ever used string detections.

But to be on the safe side you could rename every string in the cheat or encrypt them. (easiest encryption would be to xor the strings)

[[MPGH]T-800]

So changing the string names, should make it "safer"?

"you could rename every string in the cheat or encrypt them. (easiest encryption would be to xor the strings)"

- - - Updated - - -

That doesnt do anything...

you shouldn't talk something that u don't know bro

[l1m3w1r3]

"you could rename every string in the cheat or encrypt them. (easiest encryption would be to xor the strings)"

- - - Updated - - -



you shouldn't talk something that u don't know bro

But it actually does nothing

[[MPGH]T-800]

But it actually does nothing

k /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

[SilentWarp]

What you can read from the CMD when you open the cheat. Every line from there (what you can read) is a string. You can find them in the source as "text" , they've detected those and based on them, a vac wave was sent.

Enigma / Vmprotect are both useless, you get detected with or without when the cheat is detected.

exceptind client thing and the other xD


//However even if you change them you most likely will be banned tho. Create a new one from scratch.

"string detection" I really do hope this is some sort of joke as we are talking about external hacks here. You could get Valve in a load of shit if they were banning you for that.

If I created a program with a bunch of the same strings but made it do nothing that hacks the game or simply does nothing at all. They can't say you are hacking based on that...

[[MPGH]T-800]

Polyhacks - 2015-2016 , not anymore so stop quote me! @SilentWarp

[emailc123]

I know rage hack/spinbot is easily detected now. Is triggerbot also risky cheat to use?