It’s impossible to leave bad vouches on sales threads.

[redrag]

Every time I give a MPGH sales service a bad review, the thread owner reports it and, for whatever reason, a moderator always removes the post although it does not break any rules. I honestly find this quite absurd because how are we to tell if a service is reliable if the owners of the sales threads on MPGH can basically remove every bad review but only keep good reviews, thereby deceiving other users. This should not be allowed.

[[MPGH]Hova]

Which service are you referring to? Most posts are deleted because users are so angry with the seller that they post sales trash posts that borderline flame instead of posting review posts. There is a difference. If you felt a post of yours should not have been deleted however, you are always able to open up a Staff Dispute, or message a Minion of that section for an explanation.

[Smoke]

Every time I give a MPGH sales service a bad review, the thread owner reports it and, for whatever reason, a moderator always removes the post although it does not break any rules. I honestly find this quite absurd because how are we to tell if a service is reliable if the owners of the sales threads on MPGH can basically remove every bad review but only keep good reviews, thereby deceiving other users. This should not be allowed.

If you show proof of what you claim, a moderator won't delete it.
They get deleted as anyone could then claim they had a bad service with someone even if they didn't even attempt a trade.

[redrag]

Which service are you referring to? Most posts are deleted because users are so angry with the seller that they post sales trash posts that borderline flame instead of posting review posts. There is a difference. If you felt a post of yours should not have been deleted however, you are always able to open up a Staff Dispute, or message a Minion of that section for an explanation.

Oh, all I did was remake the post 5 times since it wasn't against the rules (yes, 5 times, before the moderator finally stopped removing it)

If you show proof of what you claim, a moderator won't delete it.
They get deleted as anyone could then claim they had a bad service with someone even if they didn't even attempt a trade.

How come proof is not required for good reviews? Where's the logic in that? After all, most good reviews are usually posted by the owners' friends looking to make money or get a vouch back.

[DildoTheCloutGod]

Oh, all I did was remake the post 5 times since it wasn't against the rules (yes, 5 times, before the moderator finally stopped removing it)



How come proof is not required for good reviews? Where's the logic in that? After all, most good reviews are usually posted by the owners' friends looking to make money or get a vouch back.

You are required to post proof of purchase for good reviews...

[[MPGH]Flengo]

This is currently kind of being worked on or discussed

[Tide]

theres a difference between a bad review and sales trashing OP.

[Rob]

Here's the problem:
You're required to post proof for any claim, good or bad. This is fine.
The problem is.... mods have too much to check for every post.
So a report for salesbashing is seen but a vouch without proof isn't.

[bankisdank]

I think sales bashing is typically not allowed.

[Allura]

I think sales bashing is typically not allowed.

If its a review, then it is allowed. Its not allowed if you bash the service without reason. Like just saying "the seller sucked, this service sucks" etc.

[Edible Cyanide]

maybe you over "raged" at your seller? Like pretend he didn't sell you something b/c he was out of stock, and you got mad and say a bunch of stuff that never really happened. You can post proof if you want to post a bad vouch for the person though, or else your post will be deleted for sales bashing.

[Boombox]

flame is lame.