That's also because CS:S is now seasoned. Chances are you find "nooblets" playing CS:S. Upon its release you would have found that CS was rife with hackers and QQers.
CA is much more accessible and new hence you will find more "nooblets".
And that remark about the company is irrelevant. I'm pretty sure every company has made good and bad games. Where Nexon decides to spend their revenue is completely irrelevant to the topic.
Jesus Christ i love debating
lol 88 views 87 replies
the only reason i play CA is coz it's free and fun and i only got nx once and it was something i regret kinda a waste since i can't play now on school days
instead go fishing XD
And anyway, it isn't about the company itself. It is about the experience that the company has had, making other games.
I really cannot think of any other way that css can get any better.
Don't try to argue with me, it is just my opinion
As a fellow Australian you should know that the ping we get from playing combat arms is a bitch. Our internet speed is behind the rest of the world anyway.
Last edited by RoflMyWaffle; 03-24-2010 at 05:40 AM.
Well I guess the Combat Arms forums isn't the right place to debate about another game being better than Combat Arms
this thread is actually still going
LIVERPOOL FC
yea but getting the whole community to move there will be hard
yea im off too. i think this thread will stop now.
21 posts in this thread
GG
Last edited by RoflMyWaffle; 03-24-2010 at 05:54 AM.
Thread is no longer on original topic, closed.