Originally Posted by
May0nayZ
@dheir
1. I write my own stuff and unless you see me quote or link to original material to give credit where it is due, it is my own doing thank you very much.
2. I am not here to debate you or anyone on this. I don't have the time to waste. I know I am correct - technically or otherwise. And since I said this is "for the record" I meant to make my point and leave it at that without debate. I did that and save this reply for posterity, I don't intend on replying or debating this further as I made my point.
3. I wasn't trying to say "hello". I know where the proper area is for this and if I cared to use it I would. I am a lurker and I chose to post here and I follow my own rules. I didn't break any here. But if you like, consider that my "hello" with "class".
@whodat9,
And your reply shows you are just like Janet Jackson's new look - unoriginal and tired. Sorry if I show YOU no class. I didn't think I was required to show class to some anonymous Internet face behind a computer screen like me but who I will never meet and doesn't know me IRL to judge me. But I digress. Let me know when you become important enough that I should show you class and I will. Until then, sorry Charlie. Enough said.
@Obama,
Just because the people really want 2+2 to equal 5 doesn't mean it will be. Evidence is too great. Calling it 5 when it is obvious it is 4 is laughable at best, ignorant at worst. Calling it 'hax' when it is just 'cheats' is in this same boat. You can't change the obvious just because people are too ignorant or lazy to differentiate "hacking" from "cheating". Just saying.
In any event, I said my piece and I rest my case people. Any replies made to this is just for ego or flames. I will not engage such childishness and consider me Back on Topic from hereon. And for the sake of staying on this topic and my apologies to the TS for my OTC:
BoT:
Awesome work. An RPM cheat that overlays. I have seen some YT vids on this and I am impressed. One question though: Why does the filename say "ExternalBoxEsp43.184" which can make one think it is for the previous version and not 195 as was shown in the previous version? Can be confusing? Just curious.