Wow You actually posted this
you should probably lose some flames it's kinda like attacking me with the fire
do not flame this thread i am not showing it off i am simplie asking on how i can make it better and tips to make it look good. please help me out with this. and don't flame.. its not done yet.. intern why im asking for assisance to spruce it up to a good looking tag/sig. (Begginer here..)
V1
V2 any better with the flames?
Last edited by skizz720; 08-12-2010 at 03:34 PM.
new sig/tag:
Wow You actually posted this
you should probably lose some flames it's kinda like attacking me with the fire
lol looks nice great job 4/5
skizz720 (08-12-2010)
tone down the flames its a bit too much
Flames are better now Considering you probably took 10-15 minutes on this
I think it looks great(good)
First thing I noticed is that the middle render is out of proportion.
Be sure to hold shift when using the transform tool to resize anything.
Multiple focal points usually isn't a good idea,
it's better to keep it to one render if you're doing this type of sig.
If it were something that showed off a lot of landscape,
and you wanted to do a manipulation with multiple focals,
that is a different story.
Try to expand your use of effects.
As some people said earlier, the flames are a bit overbearing and I must agree.
Read up on tutorials and keep practicing.
skizz720 (08-12-2010)
Why do you always distract from the focal? You either blur it till it's not visible or just spam "flames" over it so you can't see it. Protip: keep the focal visible.
This isn't meant to be a flame so please don't complain.
My suggestinons: lose the flames, add abstract lining.. or a fractal render on overlay with 55-75 transparency, and lose the multiples.
but other then that, there's now a whole lot you can do with this kind of sig..
Wow dude. you can't just do one bad effect throughout the whole sig. tone down the fire and by that I mean get rid of some not just turn down the opacity of it. Then add more effects.