lol this defeats the purpose of "free stoff pl0x"
I thought we had this already, ok let me quote it for you...
It isn't to point wheter you care about Michelle Obama, the point is that it is a fact, and thus is a valid argumentBecause politics works like this.
One side: Facts.
Other side: Facts.
Both sides have "facts" and both arguments are pretty much solid more or less.
In the end, the "attacker" always starts stereotyping(just as you did). And then the "defending" side has just goes "that doesn't represent me".
Which returns us to the main thread,
If the gouverment is as corrupt as this, then how can they have any problems with implenting such a law/treaty as discribed in page 1?
Well gee, if they were as corrupt as you say they are, then its already in motion and your nothing but a mindless drone lost in its own reality as you are hooked up into a machine without you even knowing it.
The point about facts was that i was completely right.
One side points out facts that have nothing to do with the original argument, but are true. Then the attacker presses that you defend these facts although the defender doesn't give a shit.
It isn't an argument because only one side is willing to argue something that has no value to the other side.
sign the petition