well if its a trusted member then yes , but i wouldnt trust a newb .
Hey guys so I just wanted to see how many people care whether or not hacks with any % of Malware should be allowed.
I feel that any sort malware is bad no matter if it is a packing virus or whatever. It may not even be a pack even if the coder says it is.
I think there should be a certain cutoff or maybe you should have to have it 100% clean. There is one example that is 15/36 (46%) that people downloaded anyway. I dont understand the knowledge that these people have. A virus is a virus and I prefer my files clean.
Anyway, not knocking anybody, i dont want any flame on this thread. Just discuss it and tell everyone how you feel. Thats all
habsfan8
Respect List
God601
Obama
topblast
caflames
-ExileD-
well if its a trusted member then yes , but i wouldnt trust a newb .
If a hack has a dirty scan, but is a working hack, why not approve it?
If a hack is fake/virus/keylogger with a clean scan, would you approve it
Retarded thread IMO...
of course they shouldnt
fail thread fails
I never approve a dirty scan
Only time I will, is when VB Section and other higher ups say it's a false positive.
/no