Why don't you guys just use the SDK?

[josue18]

Hey guys, I see pro coders reversing CA structs from the scratch. Why they don't just use the SDK's source code to compile their hacks and then modify the classes offsets in case its needed?
Is it really necessary to reverse all the craps from 0?

[J]

The SDK doesn't have everything we need, only the functions to set everything up. (We need to get everything ourselves, then use the SDK)

[josue18]

The SDK doesn't have everything we need, only the functions to set everything up. (We need to get everything ourselves, then use the SDK)

then why people create the ILTClient interface class themselves with unknown members when they could just copy-paste it from the SDK? I don't understand why they do this...

[J]

then why people create the ILTClient interface class themselves with unknown members when they could just copy-paste it from the SDK? I don't understand why they do this...

It's not the same as combat arms.

[Crash]

Sure, because CA is exactly the same and nothing has been changed.

[J]

Sure, because CA is exactly the same and nothing has been changed.

/QFT + /thanked

[josue18]

Sure that not all members of the SDK's ILTClient class are not in the exact offset like CA classes, but we cannot order its members according with CA offsets?

ILTClient being from LithTech engine is the one CA uses and what I noticed is that we can use the SDK classes with few changes on it (NOLF2 SDK)

[J]

Sure that not all members of the SDK's ILTClient class are not in the exact offset like CA classes, but we cannot order its members according with CA offsets?

ILTClient being from LithTech engine is the one CA uses and what I noticed is that we can use the SDK classes with few changes on it (NOLF2 SDK)

No. Once again, CA has changed ALOT, the only use for the SDK is for setting up stuff like world2screen.

[Crash]

Sure that not all members of the SDK's ILTClient class are not in the exact offset like CA classes, but we cannot order its members according with CA offsets?

ILTClient being from LithTech engine is the one CA uses and what I noticed is that we can use the SDK classes with few changes on it (NOLF2 SDK)

A few things are the same apparently like LTVector and LTRotation

[J]

A few things are the same apparently like LTVector and LTRotation

Yes, it is in-fact the same.

[mmbob]

Lol Crash is just repeating what I've said to him /.

[Crash]

Lol Crash is just repeating what I've said to him /.

/ it true tho n00b.

[mmbob]

/ it true tho n00b.

Give credits .

[josue18]

thanks for the answers, I'm going to reverse a class now
feel free to close this spam thread

[whatup777]

A few things are the same apparently like LTVector and LTRotation

?