Science and Nature vs "Savior" Religions

**666HiddenMaster666** · 12-04-2010

I support and believe that science and nature is greater and the creator of the Universe and Dimensions, not the so called "Jesus" or "Muhammad"

Important sciences involved:
The four big ones of Nature:
Geology: Study of earth, how Earth formed
Biology: Study of life, how life came from
Physics: Study of space, how other celestial bodies formed, supporting earth
Chemistry: Study of the elements, how they work to create
Biochemistry: Study of how certain elements created and help life function
Quantum Physics: Study of space and time, how everything runs together

Other types:
Psychology: Study of the human mind to see what is happening

All of these are the most common and best ways to prove religion wrong, especially psychology, which may seem irrelevant

The word that all "Savior" Religious people hate:
EVOLUTION

Anyone wish to debate with me?

**tdct** · 12-04-2010

The catholic faith has a big word for a retarded cop out - transcendence, basically it's a crappy come back saying we cannot begin to understand the way God works, therefore there is no use trying to disprove him in any way.

**666HiddenMaster666** · 12-05-2010

Originally Posted by tdct

The catholic faith has a big word for a retarded cop out - transcendence, basically it's a crappy come back saying we cannot begin to understand the way God works, therefore there is no use trying to disprove him in any way.

LOL
But we do have proof on how to understand the way this so called "god" works via psychology

**Casavir** · 12-05-2010

Jesus and Muhammed didn't make the universe.
Muhammed is the great prophet for muslims,Jesus is 1/3 of the Triadic God for the Christians and the Messiah(I'm talking about 'unedited' christians)
anyway...That's why they're religions
we choose to believe,without any scientific proof.
you do not.
End of conversation.

**666HiddenMaster666** · 12-05-2010

Originally Posted by Casavir

Jesus and Muhammed didn't make the universe.
Muhammed is the great prophet for muslims,Jesus is 1/3 of the Triadic God for the Christians and the Messiah(I'm talking about 'unedited' christians)
anyway...That's why they're religions
we choose to believe,without any scientific proof.
you do not.
End of conversation.

Yea, but this is the debate section, and this subject has been lasting a long time
Also, Obama recommended me posting here

**Alen** · 12-05-2010

The religious people I know always say that one can't tell the difference between a 100 year old tree and a year old tree that God created to be 99 years old.

Any religious believer can say: God created everything so that we see what we do

**666HiddenMaster666** · 12-05-2010

Originally Posted by Coeus

The religious people I know always say that one can't tell the difference between a 100 year old tree and a year old tree that God created to be 99 years old.

Any religious believer can say: God created everything so that we see what we do

How is it possible for a tree to be 99 yrs old when it has been proven to be 100? The counting of the rings in the trunk proves it all

But we can use that science created everything
Religious people have no physical proof where "god" came from, just as we have no physical proof on how there were light in the first place to create Big Bang
Even so, scientists are still studying it, whereas religious is at a dead end

**Visiblegaming** · 12-05-2010

Originally Posted by Casavir

Jesus and Muhammed didn't make the universe.
Muhammed is the great prophet for muslims,Jesus is 1/3 of the Triadic God for the Christians and the Messiah(I'm talking about 'unedited' christians)
anyway...That's why they're religions
we choose to believe,without any scientific proof.
you do not.
End of conversation.

i was just about say that

Originally Posted by 666HiddenMaster666

I support and believe that science and nature is greater and the creator of the Universe and Dimensions, not the so called "Jesus" or "Muhammad"

Important sciences involved:
The four big ones of Nature:
Geology: Study of earth, how Earth formed
Biology: Study of life, how life came from
Physics: Study of space, how other celestial bodies formed, supporting earth
Chemistry: Study of the elements, how they work to create
Biochemistry: Study of how certain elements created and help life function
Quantum Physics: Study of space and time, how everything runs together

Other types:
Psychology: Study of the human mind to see what is happening

All of these are the most common and best ways to prove religion wrong, especially psychology, which may seem irrelevant

The word that all "Savior" Religious people hate:
EVOLUTION

Anyone wish to debate with me?

Read the quran and you will find many things about these subjects long before science found them.

Why we didn't claim it?

1-we dont believe in science, science is another religion techniqly, the belief of there being no God is still a belief.

2-We didn't know scientist were going to find them, so there was no point of pointing them out.

**tdct** · 12-05-2010

Originally Posted by Visiblegaming

i was just about say that

Read the quran and you will find many things about these subjects long before science found them.

Why we didn't claim it?

1-we dont believe in science, science is another religion techniqly, the belief of there being no God is still a belief.

2-We didn't know scientist were going to find them, so there was no point of pointing them out.

You said "we" several times, so it's safe to say your Muslim and I can start offensive attacks on your religion = y/n?