"We swallow greedily any lie that flatters us, but we sip only little by little at a truth we find bitter." ~ Denis Diderot
The first law expresses that energy can be transformed, i.e. changed from one form to another, but cannot be created or destroyed.
What I'm trying to prove here is that matter or energy cannot be created out of nothing,so there must of been something there before this big eneryball matter that became the big bang. As I stated a while ago we can go on and on about what was before the big bang and where did existance come from and no of us would have an answer.That is unless we believe in a Supreme Being that made everything but then what created it or Him.It's a never ending question.That is why for me it's by Faith and personal experience that I believe in God.
Can any man prove why anything exists?Can matter exist on its own?This is for you 2012 naysayers=The end is not near unless God Say so.
Can any man prove why anything exists?Can matter exist on its own?This is for you 2012 naysayers=The end is not near unless God Say so.
both other religions believe and back up god
@Stifmeister
"We swallow greedily any lie that flatters us, but we sip only little by little at a truth we find bitter." ~ Denis Diderot
Can any man prove why anything exists?Can matter exist on its own?This is for you 2012 naysayers=The end is not near unless God Say so.
Law of cause and effect @dragon73
Aka. something can't come from nothing.
This is the thing most atheists use against Christians. That God couldn't have come from nothing. This is when they think they have won the argument, but yet they don't see the irony.
Their precious "Big Bang" supposedly created the Universe billions of years ago when there was NAUGHT (no matter, no hookers, no negros, no space, nothing).
If the Big Bang did happen from nothing, this means that it defied the law of cause and effect ... meaning that God CAN exist
inb4virtualparticles
>accepted theory
>used by 80% of new fag/stupid atheists who jump on the non-conformism bandwagon
@natiko
Last edited by Stifmeister; 05-06-2011 at 05:46 AM.
[IMG]https://images.encyclopediadramatic*****m/images/3/35/Lotr_meme.gif[/IMG]
Previous names
-darknezzrox
-Subpoena
[IMG]https://images.encyclopediadramatic*****m/images/5/57/Pedobear_a.gif[/IMG]
dragon73 (05-06-2011)
Way to state the obvious..did I ever say it wasn't a theory..?
How about nobody knows a Goddamn thing pertaining to how the universe was created.
That's the most realistic answer.
Creationist choose to believe it was a deity or higher power,
and Atheist believe there is a more scientific answer goverened by what humans are more familiar with: LOGIC
Simply put: This argument is like pissing into the wind.
Last edited by Assalamu alaikum; 05-06-2011 at 12:18 PM.
You stated that the argument which says that thermodynamics proves God's existence is just a theory, using the word 'just' as a connotation in a way to reduce value/crediability due to the fact that it's a mere theory. Big Bang is just a theory too, nevertheless it's the way you accept of how the universe started.
God is great, beer is good, and people are crazy.