BF3 or MW3?

[Troy]

MW3 All the way, somehow i think BF3 Will screw up pretty bad, and COD has been a VERY long lasting Franchise.

[F L Ø Y Ð]

I want both

[ydocsmada]

bf3, already preordered.. couple months ago actually

[Snowdog-10]

CoD Rock... BF2 Suck seriously So I think Battel Field 3 would be the same no offended to B.F Fans. Call of Duty Story are better.... I Hope Call of Duty Modern.W 3 Ghost still alive...

[[MPGH]Doc]

MW3 All the way, somehow i think BF3 Will screw up pretty bad, and COD has been a VERY long lasting Franchise.

Battlefield is longer

[loopy85]

Personally, I think MW3 is probably gonna be like every other CoD. Which of course means it's gonna sell ridiculously well. As for BF3, I honestly haven't really looked into it yet, so I'm not gonna vote against either side.

[Edvardas96]

bfbc3 is betterxD

its not Bad Company 3 its Battlefield 3, stupid kid...

[Ore0]

i vote both but wtf no option for both bf3 & mw3?

[Heartview]

If it ain't the best, then keep working on it And frostbite wasn't broken.

No, you dont. And I never said the frostbite engine was broken. The IWengine is based off a build of an idtech engine, making it essentially an idtech engine game. The idengine is one of the best engines out there for FPS games, considering that it not only has pretty good graphics, but is very smooth and can run on many computers.

All that useless graphical shit that only makes the game look good at first glance that every one keeps saying is the reason why the frostbite engine is so good is utterly useless and at times annoying when actually trying to play. Destruction is nice, but would not fit in a CoD game in any way.

So if you ask me, the ability to be able to play the game on an every day computer at somewhat-not-amazing graphics much beats out a game that looks really nice but requires a really nice computer to play on anything but shit graphics. Even if you can cut down trees and make holes in walls.

[Zack]

Hard choice though.

[[MPGH]Doc]

No, you dont. And I never said the frostbite engine was broken. The IWengine is based off a build of an idtech engine, making it essentially an idtech engine game. The idengine is one of the best engines out there for FPS games, considering that it not only has pretty good graphics, but is very smooth and can run on many computers.

All that useless graphical shit that only makes the game look good at first glance that every one keeps saying is the reason why the frostbite engine is so good is utterly useless and at times annoying when actually trying to play. Destruction is nice, but would not fit in a CoD game in any way.

So if you ask me, the ability to be able to play the game on an every day computer at somewhat-not-amazing graphics much beats out a game that looks really nice but requires a really nice computer to play on anything but shit graphics. Even if you can cut down trees and make holes in walls.

Well said. That's exactly what I've been trying to say all along.

[MrDutchTutorial]

No offense but, when you post a Poll here, everyone vote's for MW3, and it's the same for for BF3

[Heartview]

No offense but, when you post a Poll here, everyone vote's for MW3, and it's the same for for BF3

As B4M pointed out earlier, it was made in another section and BF3 won, but MW3 still came ahead by some number of votes.

[Markus]

No offense but, when you post a Poll here, everyone vote's for MW3, and it's the same for for BF3

you should do one in general .

[[MPGH]Doc]

you should do one in general .

They get closed straight away in general.