indeed...Jaded, im not sure if you think that render was smudged or anything, but it is actually an ATI image....
https://ec1.images-amazon.com/images/...CLZZZZZZZ_.jpg
really. well if you wuold like, i can tell you in confidence i didnt even touch the smudge tool in that sig ONCE so how is that pwnt. ive never seen that style anywhere before either/.
indeed...Jaded, im not sure if you think that render was smudged or anything, but it is actually an ATI image....
https://ec1.images-amazon.com/images/...CLZZZZZZZ_.jpg
yes i can see you didnt touch the smudge tool in it.. but you did brush, and last time i checked lots of people brush. In my opinion there's nothing but whored styles. you cant find a style not whored. dont think im "hattin"
noob styles arent whored....like anyones earliest sigs, they don't have a style...hence they can't be whored, they are random and pure imagination
(i don;t tihnk you can classify "brushed' as a style, it is more of a technique, which would be completely different)
if you look at my tutorial, you will see this is all i brushed........ this is every lats piece of brushing i did. so i didnt whore brushing. look closely, theres about a massive 3 brushes there. WOAH STAND BACK!
sorry if im sounding angry or mean, no offense intended. also, i meant like brushing is extremely varied, as is smudging. but you see alot of similar smudging like "grab your X brush and smudge a little outwards frmo the render" over and over and over. find me a repetetive brush backgruond that you see like that and ill agree.
take grundge brushes for example..about smudging would you rather go into detail like smudge the smallest part o fhte render with the x brush while jacking off to porn? i know i wouldnt do that, every one is aloud there own opinion so i will no further agrue
Originally Posted by jadedfrog
there abouts 9,500 members who make sigs and jack off to porn at the same time..
im glad i hardly do both
Lies. Nothing makes you happy jaded.
:O Something could...
im totally lost in this little convo ur having so ill reply to what jaded said-
jaded, i go into detail (and even tho i dont really mean to) because many designers can get confused at times. such as when peopl bluntly say something like- ok grab the dodge tool and equip it to lowlevel harshness and dodge up the render left side, then set it to the bright4est setting with a crosshatch filter.
now who here understood that? tbh i actually did, but its just things like that that make me do shit like over explain, like what im doing right now!
lol didnt follow you
tbh i didnt read it cba too
its cbf**
and jaded i totally agre with you in every sense youve said here. i am not saying what i am properly trying to say. so here it is (dont know why i didnt say it b4)
smudging is a good style, itrs not a techinque. a techinque is like your crazy abstract. thats a techinque. a stylwe is something that isnt neccaserily difficult but requires little inspiration and creativity. i am sure there are ways smudging can be extremely unique but i am yet to see one. my main point was this- i am tired of seeing people using just the most basic form of smudging as they read it. the best thing anyone can teach you in photoshop is this one little thing- be creative. individual.
so much spamming.....i don't get anything.....
(the tut's not loading...)