*slit's wrist with a topaz*
*slit's wrist with a topaz*
Originally Posted by ViciousArtGifts:
[daniliard][J3T][Trianglez][J3T(Again)]
No Topaz dude.. dam...
64 bit cs5 does not have topaz...
I think maybe the render just had Topaz already on it?
i dont know, i thought it looked pretty good and dont know if
people do that anyways
Moar Comments!
@Doc
@Keroaplt
@Faux
Btw heres Render i used
[IMG]https://i784.photobucke*****m/albums/yy121/SeYeKo-/Tron-1.png[/IMG]
Well, either way, the render is gay. Colors are fine, text is fine (oddly placed though), effects are fine, lighting on the render is not fine though.
Originally Posted by ViciousArtGifts:
[daniliard][J3T][Trianglez][J3T(Again)]
ARHQA$Y$YW4AYG4y (09-05-2011)
It looks bright around his face, yet his face is not.
Originally Posted by ViciousArtGifts:
[daniliard][J3T][Trianglez][J3T(Again)]
What Matt said: The render is really gay, the head size is strange. And how can you guys notice when some work has topaz?
I only see topaz on the render and even then everyone calls anything even close to that effect topaz
Work on your composition don't make renders occupy more than 60% of the tag space
ARHQA$Y$YW4AYG4y (09-05-2011)
Sigh..
I don't give three shits what people say.
I can spot topaz pretty fucking simply.
The bg has the same aliasing trademarks as the render,
which btw, the render was manipulated WITH TOPAZ beyond the original..
If you can't see it, ******s need glasses.
Besides.. fecher seems like the type of guy to topaz the render just to prove he's right.
Last edited by Mina's undies; 09-05-2011 at 02:32 PM.
[IMG]https://i597.photobucke*****m/albums/tt55/Domesplitter/1245929361_ong_bak2_backflip_kick.gif[/IMG]