Infraction for complimenting someone's artwork.

[[MPGH]Toxin]

Yesterday, Gab(xxModz) posted a piece of art work, and I complimented on it, saying basically if there was literally shit on the piece, that it still would be too good to call it shit, and I got infracted for it.

The post was here:

https://www.mpgh.net/forum/148-showro...ml#post5394250


I'm sure we can get this cleared.

@xXModz
@Liz
@Dave84311
@arunforce

[[MPGH]Austin]

AND THE TABLES HAVE TURNED

[Lehsyrus]

@Toxin I agree you shouldn't have been infracted, but maybe next time word it slightly differently? Maybe if you said "If I took a shit on this, I still couldn't call it shit".

But still that is a compliment and the infraction should be reversed.

[[MPGH]Toxin]

@Toxin I agree you shouldn't have been infracted, but maybe next time word it slightly differently? Maybe if you said "If I took a shit on this, I still couldn't call it shit".

But still that is a compliment and the infraction should be reversed.

Isn't that exactly what I said?

[Lehsyrus]

Isn't that exactly what I said?

It's basically what you said, but if someone didn't take in account for the apostrophe+t in couldn't and forgot the n somehow (or just forgot their glasses) I can understand how they would get confuse taking a quick glance over.

I still stand by the reversal of the infraction though

[[MPGH]Liz]

You know the deal, if you dont want people to misunderstand you, phrase shit noob friendly. You were staff, there should be no disputes from you.

[[MPGH]Dave84311]

I already told you why I infracted you.

It was interpreted by me as his sig wasn't worth shit.

Toodles.