BomberMan

[sf0d]

[Chronologix]

seems too bland...monotone, negative space, dont really know what the render is, and the effects over it....

[sf0d]

BomberMan. Yeah.. dunno why i posted it i just played around with it for 10 minutes.

[The_Enigma]

Purely B&W = Instant Lose.

[[MPGH]iverson954360]

i dont think the render is even bomberman... if its the one im talking about the guy on the n64 u know

[SATANICAT]

looks like samus off of metroid prime

[Mikoll]

It's hard to see what the render is. It is way too dark.

If you post something and talk about how much you doubt it, then there's no point in posting it at all.

[sf0d]

https://www.gamewallpapers.com/wallpa...an%3A+Act+Zero

[[MPGH]iverson954360]

what fags they changed a classic character into this

[-[standoff]-]

OMG GAY BOMBERMAN 2 ON SNES WAS TEH PWNAGE!!!!!!!!!!

well, i dont mind B+W but i think its overdone there. you have hardly anything going on and the B+W just covers it up

[sf0d]

OMG GAY BOMBERMAN 2 ON SNES WAS TEH PWNAGE!!!!!!!!!!

well, i dont mind B+W but i think its overdone there. you have hardly anything going on and the B+W just covers it up

I KNOW IT SUX ZZZ

[-[standoff]-]

the sig or the new bomberman

[sf0d]

my sig stop posting jeez was looking for ideas of improvement but instead i got SUX SUX SUX

[-[standoff]-]

well no, the signature doesnt suck. signatures dont really suck when wwe give them reviews on improvement and whats wrong. thats just how reviews are, doesnt mean it sucsk we point out improvable things..

and also, the black and white ( what i meant to say) was that it was black and white with hardly any substance, like i cant see very much going on so maybe i would like it more with some action going on, but the lining effects on the render and the splattering near the left is good.