Nudity in Sigs.

[moosicgawd]

Guys, seriously you need to quit putting naked girls in your sigs. You guys want to be staff but your breaking forum rules by posting nude images. In my eyes its taking away from the sig itself and only making it about a tit showing..

[Ryguy]

yea, i agree

[Zhellbound]

-.-
I dont want to argue. But i guess there has to be one objection.
I just dont see how one tit is called porn.
i really dont think that one tit is taking away from the sig.
Everybody keeps using the same renders, same styles. Everything.
Ill stop with the one tit showing. But im just saying. Its not that big of a deal.
And if your to immature for ONE tit. Then your to immature to be on mpgh.net.

[Ryguy]

He didnt say porn
And i dont think this isnt only directed at you


I agree because i dont think its fair that for example


Someone makes a sig with a nude girl in it, spends idk 15mins on it? Its basic BG stock, brushes, render
Rating=10/10

Someone else that does hard work and the sig actually looks good, better than the nude girl one. It has much more in it with a great outcome
Rating=7/10


Now im not saying that ratings make the gfx section a competition but im just saying that people might get a higher rating just because it has nudity in it

Also it is a violation of the rules

[moosicgawd]

Zhell, Your telling ME that I'm to immature for porn? Dude I love porn, But this isn't the write place for nudity..
And plus, I never said it was porn, I said its against MPGH rules so shut the fuck up. seriously..
And if you want another style then try abstract or something along those lines..

[Zhellbound]

Zhell, Your telling ME that I'm to immature for porn? Dude I love porn, But this isn't the write place for nudity..
And plus, I never said it was porn, I said its against MPGH rules so shut the fuck up. seriously..
And if you want another style then try abstract or something along those lines..

I didnt direct it to you. It was to the thread in general.
Everybodies calling it porn.

I said its against MPGH rules so shut the fuck up. seriously..

Was that really nessecary.?

[moosicgawd]

I didnt direct it to you. It was to the thread in general.
Everybodies calling it porn.


Was that really nessecary.?

sorry, i'm having a bad week.

[Ryguy]

added to moosic-
(directed at zhell)
a nude girl in your sig is not a new style

[BPK]

Yes, because if I'm not mistaken, one of the rules IS no nudity.

[moosicgawd]

It IS one of the rules, gouravs threads have been deleted for it in here.

[Obey]

Oh, who don't like have naked cartoon girls? :@


No real talk. That's pretty fucked up.

[BPK]

Ah yes. See that? We aren't being fractual ******s here Zhell, just sticking to one of the more enforced rules.

[Empire]

its basically gonna make our site not for teenagers, cus if their parents see this every other post i doubt they are gonna let them come here again.
I'm perfectly fine with it, its just that im pretty sure some people will get the wrong impression of our site.

[IMG]https://i334.photobucke*****m/albums/m414/sjwho2/SignatureFromCloud.png[/IMG]

[Obey]

its basically gonna make our site not for teenagers, cus if their parents see this every other post i doubt they are gonna let them come here again.
I'm perfectly fine with it, its just that im pretty sure some people will get the wrong impression of our site.

[IMG]https://i334.photobucke*****m/albums/m414/sjwho2/SignatureFromCloud.png[/IMG]

That GIRL IS COVERING HER CLIT. OMFG SHOW MEEE.

Child pron. I honestly think Dave should do something about it.

[BPK]

Child pron. I honestly think Dave should do something about it.

Yarz. Heer heer.