obama and mpgh peps look at this idea

[farsight13]

mpgh should amke a new rule to choobs and newbs and members that if they need at least 300 posts to get pub hacks and if they make at least 5 spamm posts of threads they lose 30 post counts and can go into negative that wouldd stop spamm and other stuuff and if they keep it up they get a 10 day bann after being warned for spamming or leeching

[cracker415]

farsight13 just cuz u got 300 posts dont mean its ganna be easy to get to 300 posts just to use hacks and ppl will leave this site and the ppl who have 300+ posts will just leech the hacks to other sites

[farsight13]

o wow dont u hear other sites wont put up for combat arms public hacks anymore duh

[akila111]

umm newb up top im not at 300 post im at 305 and i didnt do this thread just cuz i just made it to 300 but becuz some newbs and chewbs like u keep crying for hacks and spamming

try to see my point i do not see why i should make 50or60 more post to get them i don't ask i have bitched when i payed but this dosn't seem fair and i may not be alone

[chrisisafoo]

it shouldnt but post count but how helpful you are

you should have to have been thanked at least 20 times to get pub hacks

[farsight13]

yeah thats true thats a good idea yeah but then alot of peps not gonna get hacks and peps gonna make a new profile and thank themselves

[BARON]

it shouldnt but post count but how helpful you are

you should have to have been thanked at least 20 times to get pub hacks

That's a good idea But WATE MEMBERS WOULD START MAKING MULTIPLE ACCOUNTS TO THANK THEMSELVES

and if you say that ppl cant make more than one account by ip'ing them well let's think family members could use that computer for MPGH

so yeah

[akila111]

yeah thats true thats a good idea yeah but then alot of peps not gonna get hacks and peps gonna make a new profile and thank themselves

It seems there are ways around that to
and i have helped ppl when i can i don't no how to hack but i have
i Never put thank me on a sig

[farsight13]

so overral to end this arguement umm should whe make peps have to get thanked at least 20 times and if they get thanked for a leech or stupid think thye lose back that thanx wat u think but u would need new mpgh leaders

[Legify]

but how do you define a spam post..

i consider this post i am making right now a spam post

ALL YOUR POSTS ARE SPAM POSTS

[mac_man]

Higher post to get hacks=more spamming.

i agree it will happend if we put a post limit , im not saying cause i dont have alot of post i realy dont care what u think about my post but im just said it will cause to much spam.

mod srry if this is consider a spam

[farsight13]

umm well younger mpgh peps well i dont noe wat to say then lets just make a thank you type of thin gif u dont have enough peps thanking u then u cant get hacks 20 thank youss the least and thank you has to have sense in post

[UnLoK]

i agree with this post he is right i think is better for all to stop spammers

[dk173]

we should not have post counts in hacks but a section for updated pubs that dave makes in a section that needs a post count to enter but others can post there hacks just 4 all

[Rike73]

That is really bias from you since you have more than 300 posts. Not really fair for some new members who really want to contribute and not spam.

[Gourav2122]

this has been discussed on mpgh already in great detail..
this idea dose not work..