New idea for bypass

[kellzverde]

i've been thinking would it be possible to freeze a value associated with the hshield in order to halt the scanning using a memory hacking tool ??

[User1]

i've been thinking would it be possible to freeze a value associated with the hshield in order to halt the scanning using a memory hacking tool ??

Probability is that your memory hacker is gona crash CA b4 you can every attach it on without a bypasser. But if you have a bypasser, why the hack? So confusing at times... XD And I don't think such a value exsists.

[kellzverde]

well ive been trying the problem arrises where i have no idea which .dll is incharge of scanning dam clever nexon

[User1]

The best way is to not let it run at all, there fore the reason of bypassers...

[Grim]

well ive been trying the problem arrises where i have no idea which .dll is incharge of scanning dam clever nexon

keep at it.. u never know man.. maybe your right, maybe your wrong... find out and let us know lol could be the other way around tho.. could be CA needing a response from HS in order to run properly.. check that out.. see if u cant give it false clarification

I'M HIGHER THAN YOUR MOMMAS BLOOD SUGAR!!!

[sidman11]

well ive been trying the problem arrises where i have no idea which .dll is incharge of scanning dam clever nexon

msvrct.dll controls the hackshield start-up process..

however the values are locked so if you just "delete" an address HS reads from, its will just give an error message like, Combat Arms has encountered a problem and needs to close, or Failed to update protection modules (xxxxxxxxx, xxxxx)

bypassing it isn't as simple as just deleting an address, so the coders of bypasses should be given real props...

[Ghty82]

Yep if Hshield fails to load Combat Arms will not start or give an error.

[queenikki17]

thats true but nexon always fails or messes something up

[Ghty82]

Anyway this is a paradox as you need a bypass to start the memory hacking tool to make the bypass.