possible answer to why the new trainers dont work for alot of ppl

[weaselm01]

WOW, i never thought of that, thanks lolz2much

- why aren't you a minion as well??

>.>

only three positions were available...

lol

[lolz2much]

ok im still working on this i think i actrually goofed up the hack itself so lemme check it and send it back to u guys

[Grim]

are you sending them a copy of your engine?

[lolz2much]

are you sending them a copy of your engine?

yes i am but i think i accidently screwed up the trainer and used the wrong pointer not the one i meant to

[Corndog]

good, cause i just spent half an hour trying to get it to work, and it didnt work...i was gonna be mad.
hope it works when u fix it

[lolz2much]

good, cause i just spent half an hour trying to get it to work, and it didnt work...i was gonna be mad.
hope it works when u fix it

get ready to be mad i added the wrong adress/pointer
lol i will fix it in a lil bit and resend it to u guys

[Faith]

Jesus. Christ, the addresses are NOT STATIC. Meaning they do not remain the same.
The Name Tage is inside a pointer. The address the pointer points to changes almost every single time the game is restarted due to not being static. So the only way to access it is find the original Base+Offset.

[lolz2much]

Jesus. Christ, the addresses are NOT STATIC. Meaning they do not remain the same.
The Name Tage is inside a pointer. The address the pointer points to changes almost every single time the game is restarted due to not being static. So the only way to access it is find the original Base+Offset.

i have that we already know the adress isnt static but 3 of us have come up with 3 different pointers, and they are only working for some ppl not everyone,

[Faith]

There is always a possibility of more than one pointer pointing to the Name. And if it doesnt work for everyone else. Then your Base Address isnt static.

[lolz2much]

There is always a possibility of more than one pointer pointing to the Name. And if it doesnt work for everyone else. Then your Base Address isnt static.

yeah ive come up with about 137 total pointers for nametags and got it down to the base pointer but it only worked for a few ppl.

iownage did the same and same deal

mine would work for me 30 diff times in a row not just once so i know i had a base pointer

[romor24]

I thought something like this was happening
I really hope this is what it is

[why06]

No operating system should ever deserve UNBELEIVABLE++++++++++++++++ Cuz they all suck. When Combat Arms can run on a OS with only one transistor on its CPU and one byte of RAM. And one byte of HDD. Then I would say that operating system is uber efficient.

Yeh if your looking for an OS that runs on that you might want to look into a Quantum Computer O_O?!


Main:
Anywho... this is really astounding if its true. However downloading a new engine off a website, even if that site is MPGH, seems really scary. I think a lot of tests should be done before people start exchanging engines... personal opinion :L. Secondly is there any difference in the size of the files? and would two engines with different addresses be two different sizes?

Also I dont understand how you logged that many addresses lolz. Wouldn't you need multiple engines to begin with in order to log the addresses for every engine? So how did u get all those addies?

Excuse me if I don't know what im talking about, Im new to this, just trying to make suggestions.

[Faith]

get the pointer address
find out what accesses it
get an offset form the results of the "find out what access"
minus that offset from the pointer's address
then get that address and search for it as 4-Byte in Hex
once you get a static address
then thats the base
if you get another address that isnt static
that means its multi pointered
and you need to keep repeating

if it still doesn't work, i dont really know. I doubt its more than one exe.

[romor24]

Secondly is there any difference in the size of the files? and would two engines with different addresses be two different sizes?

Hmmm... sounds reasonable to me... Anyone have an idea?

mine is 1.79 MB (1,887,048 bytes)

[snotpig]

Hmmm... sounds reasonable to me... Anyone have an idea?

mine is 1.79 MB (1,887,048 bytes)

Mine is...

Size: 1.79 MB (1,887,048 bytes)

Size on disk: 1.80 MB (1,888,256 bytes)