RESPONSE TO "ATHEIST" TOPIC

[blovtom1]

1) Where is your proof on the whole nonbelievers going back to church; clearly they weren't very devoted to denying god. Sounds like you pulled it out your ass.

2) The sun will not be out for a LONG, LONG, time. Humans will probably be gone by then.

3) How the hell are you supposed to prove a belief...beliefs are not hypothesis either.

4) The fact that you can even consider "making the right choice" to either be screwed or not be screwed after dieing just saddens me. Not because you say it, because I know a lot of others think the same way too. The majority of society, blah.

And lastly just putting it out there, how trustworthy is religion when most people can just pick and choose what they want to hear and ignore other shit. It's not all good and everyone knows that.

ummm was really not talking to you...i really dont feel like looking for sources to back up anything i said as i have picked it up on the news and such plus you already "know" you are correct in your line of thinking when you do not have some undisclosed evidence proving God not to be real

[Paroxysm]

correct me if im wrong paroxysm but i believe you were brought up as a christian and if not still answer me this..is there any definitive proof that God does not exist..either side still has an argument..and as long as God's side still has an argument i will struggle to live life with a purpose b/c i have tried living life as an athiest and let me tell you it is a lonely life in a sense...

You're right I was a Christian, I was told all my life that the earth is 6000 years old, that fossils are the devils tricks, and that evolution is silly nonsense. There is not definite proof that God doesn't exist, you're asking us to prove a negative which is completely silly. Those that put forward a claim "X is real", carry the burden of proof to justify their statement, I haven't heard a single reasonable argument for the existence of a god. Things that can be accepted without evidence can be denied without evidence. No one can "prove" a god exists because god by definition, is a SUPERNATURAL entity, thus beyond the natural world and beyond the reach of science. Every single argument I've ever heard for the existence of god, has dozens of rebuttals that prove it wrong, and the argument ends there, Xians just say "Well it's my belief". How does being an atheist cause you to have a lonely life? There isn't a pot of gold at the end of the rainbow, but that doesn't make the rainbow any less beautiful. When it comes to disproving god, all we can do is disprove the claims people make about god, we can't actually disprove god. For example, if you wanted to convince someone that Socrates never existed, you can't actually PROVE he never existed, all you can do is disprove the claims to his existence, and when you do this you're casting doubt onto his existence.

think about it what was the last major crisis to my knowledge to hit america??
september 11..so many "nonBelievers" were running back to church because they were scared and it is the case in many people's lives..

Even if "many "nonBelievers" were running back to church", that doesn't support the idea that a god exists, all it proves is that people were feeling like their lives were out of control. When people think things are out of control they grasp onto any thing that makes them feel in control, be it a concept or an ideology. It's one of the down-sides of human natural, we abandon all logic and reason too quickly, just so we can feel good. We're a paranoid species, we try to attribute any natural occurrence to supernatural-agencies.

I think there is a God b/c with all the science in the world which states that eventually the sun which is a star will blow up causing the earth to be destroyed also..so in the end what will all our existence have been for? what was the begining for...

That's another mistake we humans make, we assume that the reality we experience is for us, we're extremely selfish in that sense. When the sun does go red giant (if were even still here when it happens [which I HIGHLY doubt]) the universe won't miss us. Hopefully we can get off this tiny blue speck (God-willing ) long before that happens.

also you should know that even with all the technology that we have now we have not even used our earths resources to achieve the most advanced technology yet...even if you go back a 50 years when cassettes and old stuff was being used the people of their time thought there technology was the shiznit just like we think our stuff is the shiznit now...give earth a 100 more years maybe there will be technology that can decide whether or not God is real and if Jesus existed i dont know..but just know that you should not base your beliefs based on the "science" of today because it is only still developing and could go either way...
wherein you could come to find that you are screwed for blaspheming God so badly or that you were right and lived life accordingly..

The problem with this is that since the Advent of Galileo and the Modern Scientific Method, all the evidence we have gathered seems to move us further and further away from the notion that any of the major religions are right, this has been going on for 500 years now and I can't see such a HUGE turn around happening. As far as the Judeo-Christian faith goes, I've screwed the pooch on that one, I've commited an unforgivable sin, blaspheming the Holy Spirit.

"Assuredly, I say to you, all sins will be forgiven the sons of men, and whatever blasphemies they may utter; but he who blasphemes against the Holy Spirit never has forgiveness, but is subject to eternal condemnation" - because they said, "He has an unclean spirit." (Mark 3:28-30)

you already know what i choose b/c i like my chances...anyways this really is for "paroxysm" since he can hold up a legilble conversation..and would probably read through all this before replying

Oh yeah know me all too well.
You took the time to write all that out, the least I could do is read it.

[[MPGH]Dave84311]

PAROXYSM FAILS, JESUS WONT SAVE U

[Sharpe]

Religion is a fraud.

[Inna]

PAROXYSM FAILS, JESUS WONT SAVE U

HAHAHAHA JESUS LOLOL

[mikehunt..]

I'd rather spend that minute I do praying or going to Chruch doing something productive, interesting, or fun.

I'd rather study, or play the piano. Or the violin (my favourite instrument).

[Ichig00]

Hmmm. Mayb humans just thought that extraterrestrials were angels and god. Since most religions start with the same thing. Someone/somthing descending from the sky. I mean this cud be another possibility.. Just check chariots of the gods.

[Sharpe]

I'd rather study, or play the piano. Or the violin (my favourite instrument).

Do you honestly think anyone cares?

[rosencrutez]

Ummmm small problem with that statement. There is no such thing as "Darwinism", there's Evolutionary Theory. Evolutionary Theory in no way states that there is no god or higher entity.

Darwinism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[Paroxysm]

Darwinism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

When he mentioned darwinism I assumed he implied Evolutionary Thoery.

Darwinism is a term used for various movements or concepts related to ideas of transmutation of species or evolution, including ideas with no connection to the work of Charles Darwin.

So I was half right. But I'll admit I was too haste to refute his statement.

Social Darwinism is fail.

[mikehunt..]

Do you honestly think anyone cares?

Whoops, in the other post.

[mikehunt..]

And YOU'RE just a pretentious cunt-wad (Does it look like I care? That word almost matches my username, haha.) who flaunts his inflated ego (Ego? I don't post on forums to inflate my ego, just to play with people's minds and befuddle them), using intellectual superiority as a guise. (Oh, big words there, wise guy. This is everyday English, surely you have notice because you speak the same words I do.) For someone who thinks so highly of Einstein you appear to know very little about science. (I use him as my role model in my life, not to have the intellectual properties he has. That's besides the point) I'm sorry that I'm not one to spend too much time looking for grammatical/spelling errors in a coherent (I like that word) statement. (Why should you feel sorry? I'm only here to put a chapter in your life) Your reduced font size to feign humility, and "Book Antiqua" as your font? Everything about you screams of self-absorption,(Yes, I like to exclude people in all my situations on the internet) devils in the details. (Are you Christian?) I used to think you would be a good addition to MPGH, ( That's great, what else do you think of me?) expect no support from me. (I can't stop laughing).

I like where this is going. If you were to observe the font type, it's automatic in it's size. You can't change it's usual size. Tell me, when did I expect you to support me? I don't remember myself saying that. I point out little details in people's grammatical and spelling errors to just mearly enrage them. To squeez out all of the paroxysm (that's what your username means), and enjoy the unfortunate events that follow soon after. I ardor how you get so furious and annoyed when people correct you. Tell me, why is it that you think you have superiority over me in these forums? I laugh at the mear thought you have of that.

I love people's rage on the internet. My inclination for it is limitless. It's like my start of the day, and the end. Sure, you can call me mental but I like being called provocative. But not in a sexual way, if you were thinking that. I was always intelligent and impertinent in school, that's why my vocabulary is what it is today. English was my favourite of choice, as you can recognize. But I don't want to go into my life because that's not ponderous to the conversation that we're currently having.

What you described me as isn't exactly correct, you see. What people have called me were crude and repugnant names. Of course you may agree with, but you by no means, know me, or have yet met my aquaintance. Who are you to say that I'm self-absorbed?

Such suppression of dissent cannot go unpunished. Remember, I have been holding you under close scrutiny for quite a while. That's why I took a particular interest in your attempts to gain superiority over people in these forums. You remind me of another authoritarian religious extremist group, for reasons I hold to myself. You have perpetuated the anger of many people, and that is what I do not like.

Also take head for what you are saying, because many others are watching. And they do not like what they see.

Do you honestly think anyone cares?

I know that's a rhetorical question, but I'm going to answer it anyways. I know that alot of people wouldn't care, but I didn't ask for an opinion from you. Consider it useless information, I don't care. That's just me though. :]

[Paroxysm]

I like where this is going. If you were to observe the font type, it's automatic in it's size. You can't change it's usual size. Tell me, when did I expect you to support me? I don't remember myself saying that. I point out little details in people's grammatical and spelling errors to just mearly enrage them. To squeez out all of the paroxysm (that's what your username means), and enjoy the unfortunate events that follow soon after. I ardor how you get so furious and annoyed when people correct you. Tell me, why is it that you think you have superiority over me in these forums? I laugh at the mear thought you have of that.

I love people's rage on the internet. My inclination for it is limitless. It's like my start of the day, and the end. Sure, you can call me mental but I like being called provocative. But not in a sexual way, if you were thinking that. I was always intelligent and impertinent in school, that's why my vocabulary is what it is today. English was my favourite of choice, as you can recognize. But I don't want to go into my life because that's not ponderous to the conversation that we're currently having.

What you described me as isn't exactly correct, you see. What people have called me were crude and repugnant names. Of course you may agree with, but you by no means, know me, or have yet met my aquaintance. Who are you to say that I'm self-absorbed?

Such suppression of dissent cannot go unpunished. Remember, I have been holding you under close scrutiny for quite a while. That's why I took a particular interest in your attempts to gain superiority over people in these forums. You remind me of another authoritarian religious extremist group, for reasons I hold to myself. You have perpetuated the anger of many people, and that is what I do not like.

Also take head for what you are saying, because many others are watching. And they do not like what they see.


I know that's a rhetorical question, but I'm going to answer it anyways. I know that alot of people wouldn't care, but I didn't ask for an opinion from you. Consider it useless information, I don't care. That's just me though. :]

You seriously think I care what you think? Silly choobs. To put it in layman's terms, YOU'RE a snobby bitch, that crude and repugnant enough for you?

BTW: I know what my username means, and no I'm not a Christian. It's time to stop acting like King Douche Bag mpgh doesn't take kindly to King Douche Bag.

[mikehunt..]

You seriously think I care what you think? Silly choobs. To put it in layman's terms, YOU'RE a snobby bitch, that crude and repugnant enough for you?

BTW: I know what my username means, and no I'm not a Christian. It's time to stop acting like King Douche Bag mpgh doesn't take kindly to King Douche Bag.

Nice, I like how you consider me a choob. The fact that you came up with a short reply just makes me laugh. King douche bag? Is that some kind of ultimate vagina cleaner brand?

[Drew]

Its funny. You all ask for proof of God, But I see no proof of your Extra terrestrial life either? And please dont bring me the movie E.T.