you'd think people would realize theres a reason no one has won this argument over all these years
Is Atheist the people who can shoot wind from their hands? I'd love to be one of those guys. ;D
Ahh I see... pretty close though.
Empire, you'll learn soon that I'm a PEARList crusader.
This may help you understand the evolutionary process, as you obviously don't.
Understanding Evolution
Normally I would point out what's wrong with your statement but I think you'll figure out by yourself after you check out the site Berkley was kind enough to make.
Response to your Global Warming stance: *facepalm*
Last edited by Paroxysm; 08-21-2009 at 02:25 AM.
"We swallow greedily any lie that flatters us, but we sip only little by little at a truth we find bitter." ~ Denis Diderot
paroxysm, look i respect you. But evolution has huge holes in it, as does global warming. I read most of that article(although it mostly talked only of fossils). It was rather boring and repetitive of what i already gained on the subject.
"We swallow greedily any lie that flatters us, but we sip only little by little at a truth we find bitter." ~ Denis Diderot
more important to me or to you?
-.- honestly i don't have will to break down all that stuff to you right now. I understand evolution and its theory. Truly i understand just about all of it, except for the animals names, i got it. But the thing is, what most ppl think, that species like fish just jumped up on land, is to me idiotic. Because unless they suddenly developed gills, mated, found food(which their instincts wouldn't tell them) then they would probally die within a short period of time. You see i'd believe it, if i had examples of a creature who evolved. Right now. I mean the "missing link" is bs, but i want proof of some creature that obviously evolved to fit its surroundings perfectly. Now i don't want a dead example, and not something like the artic hare or some other bs. I mean if evolution were true as they say, creatures should show signs that they somehow fit their surroundings from birth, apperantly. So why does a zoo creature not evolve? Now you have to also realize, i'm christian, so god making creatures in their natural habitats still sounds a lot more realistic than evolution.
Last edited by Empire; 08-21-2009 at 02:55 AM.
Ok let me get this straight, animals popping into reality because magic-man made it so, is more realistic then small changes on the genetic scale fueled by natural selection over long periods of time changing animals to suit their environments. I'm sorry Empire, evolution happening is a fact, the system by which we model the evolutionary process is the theory. Here if you have any questions regarding the evolutionary process you want to ask an expert: Ask a Scientist
If it's any conciliation I haven't lost any respect for you, I just understand you better.
"We swallow greedily any lie that flatters us, but we sip only little by little at a truth we find bitter." ~ Denis Diderot
well, a imaginary god popping them into reality, or them just appearing. meh logical choice is 50/50 to me lulz.
anyway i'll check the site. GN T.T ima be so tired.
This is slightly related:
I hate when people say that just because there are 2 options, both are equally as likely, God existing or not existing isn't a 50/50. That's like saying well since You may wake up or you may not, there is a 50/50 chance you won't survive the night. You've been waking up every day for the past xxxx days, so your chances of not waking up are far from 50/50.
"We swallow greedily any lie that flatters us, but we sip only little by little at a truth we find bitter." ~ Denis Diderot
Can you be my Hero?
[IMG]https://i687.photobucke*****m/albums/vv238/Enuyasha22/bleach.gif[/IMG]
1 post=
1,000,000,000=