New Public MemoryScanner + MemoryWriter v1.1 -> You can Hack with it !!! <-

[HOOSIER]

okay so i demand that everyone here that uses any microsoft code give credits to the exact developer that made said language,or anyone that added to it ! :P
also the developer of the compiler they used .
My point is this really is splitting hairs he used public source from a know resource im sure every coder has used code project at least one time looking for something.
Did they all give credits for what they needed perhaps they used a whole project into a larger one "happens allot here" As far as i can see you guys used a decompiler which really is not proof other than the names being the same i saw now project names that matched at all ! in my opinion this is really silly over a simple memory tool . there are far better ones out there than this hell even ce has source . can you temper prove to me 100% that this was leeched other than just the names being the same ! if not the legal term is "Circumstantial evidence" google it you seem to be pretty smart so i believe you get the point im making here . same names does not a leecher make ! post some real proof before jumping to conclusions please . Im not saying it dont make sense im just saying your facts would not hold up in court you need more definite proof !

[ccman32]

okay so i demand that everyone here that uses any microsoft code give credits to the exact developer that made said language,or anyone that added to it ! :P
also the developer of the compiler they used .
My point is this really is splitting hairs he used public source from a know resource im sure every coder has used code project at least one time looking for something.
Did they all give credits for what they needed perhaps they used a whole project into a larger one "happens allot here" As far as i can see you guys used a decompiler which really is not proof other than the names being the same i saw now project names that matched at all ! in my opinion this is really silly over a simple memory tool . there are far better ones out there than this hell even ce has source . can you temper prove to me 100% that this was leeched other than just the names being the same ! if not the legal term is "Circumstantial evidence" google it you seem to be pretty smart so i believe you get the point im making here . same names does not a leecher make ! post some real proof before jumping to conclusions please . Im not saying it dont make sense im just saying your facts would not hold up in court you need more definite proof !

Did you even read what i said? .NET is like OPEN SOURCE, you can easily reverse the ENTIRE CODE and check everything you want. That module IS exactly the same, has the same variable names, the same module name, the same methods and everything else. It's no problem that he uses that, pretty much every coder uses something made by someone else and it's completely ok as long as you give credits. Take a look in all my older hack releases like v2.3 and you will always see the credit list at the bottom of each thread. The only problem with this is that he was obviously lying and telling everyone that this was all made by him and only him as well as he even says that im lying as a said the truth about that. That's the real problem, not the fact that he just uses other peoples stuff in his project.

[maxrio]

you have windows 98 right?

Well，my pc : cpu i3+4G ram+ win7 x64, when scanning,cpu counts about 30%

[uMaDxShep]

I Really Believe Ccman just coz hes not a normal guy hes a great coder and you all mad coz hes not update hes hack again you know why kids coz his hack is already working i old guy in this site i think there is some ppl know how to bypass it that why ccman dun't give fuck about onther ppl that come here i need every thing easy like 1,2,3 that all and thanks for all you made @ccman32

[wGRWGHWGRERGrgergergrg]

Thought the both had same titles , anyways. Hacks are known to show players behind the wall , ESP etc..

What you're posting is not considered as a hack , it's considered as multi tool.

its a cheattool you can dmg hack uav hack and those stuff with it so its a cheat and btw i never saw a hack released in this section all those stuff are cheats..

[luegie5]

CloseHandle Failed???? Help please, don't say it's because the handle doesn't exist because I tried over 50 different codes. What is the real problem? Is it the Start End???

[Joker03]

how to use

[COD3RIN]

CloseHandle Failed???? Help please, don't say it's because the handle doesn't exist because I tried over 50 different codes. What is the real problem? Is it the Start End???

not working in VAC game

[Neox.]

not working in VAC game

it work in all games >.<

[ccman32]

it work in all games >.<

This thingy uses Write-/ReadProcessMemory so it cannot work in all games because that's one of the main things anti cheats are trying to block...

[ccman32]

dont stalk in all my codes ccman...

Why should i do that? Pretty much every .NET Memory Hacking tool uses that, especially with public source code.

[MannyPacquiao]

Why should i do that? Pretty much every .NET Memory Hacking tool uses that, especially with public source code.

ccman we need to box sometime dont worry i would not hurt you to much

[COD3RIN]

it work in all games >.<

it work with no VAC game but in VAC game like AVA it not work like ccman32 said it block in VAC game

[zZzeta/S]

it work with no VAC game but in VAC game like AVA it not work like ccman32 said it block in VAC game

VAC = Valve Anti Cheat. AVA uses Xigncode not VAC....

[COD3RIN]

VAC = Valve Anti Cheat. AVA uses Xigncode not VAC....

thanks for info i dont play AVA.... but ago yes i play