Official Call of Duty: Ghosts System Requirements

[ImMalkah]

I core I7-920,6 Gb ram,got hd 4870,I will run it,Can I ?Purchased it

With that graphics card, not sure. More than likely you will .

[ImMalkah]

They should add a future to use the old textures or graphics. By that I mean not to use the new textures and the old ones like Black Ops 2. I was able to run that game on all high and now I play cod ghosts and I am Low and Medium.

I am running on 16 gigs of DDR3 ram, 2 Gig AMD Radeon HD 7570, Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz (8 CPUs), ~3.4GHz and Windows 7 64 Bit.

They will never change anything for the game. Especially for PC. So don't look forward to any new features .

[Fatality999]

My ghosts is lagging alot. Tried about everything but nothing seems to work....

~Gtx 660 2gb
~7gb of ram
~Amd phenom 2.8ghz prosessor

[ImMalkah]

My ghosts is lagging alot. Tried about everything but nothing seems to work....

~Gtx 660 2gb
~7gb of ram
~Amd phenom 2.8ghz prosessor

Don't worry, it's not your PC it's just the usual shitty IW game.

While the game is open, go into your task manager and change the priority to normal instead of above normal .

[Fatality999]

Don't worry, it's not your PC it's just the usual shitty IW game.

While the game is open, go into your task manager and change the priority to normal instead of above normal .

Tried that one too. Doesnt seem to help at all. :/

[ImMalkah]

Tried that one too. Doesnt seem to help at all. :/

Oh well, if they do decide to fix it, just wait for a patch .

[Fatality999]

Oh well, if they do decide to fix it, just wait for a patch .

Yeah. Its definitely the horribly made game considering i can run bo2 at ~100 fps.
Just waitin' for a fix to come ://

[TimKen]

CPU: i5-3570k at 4.9 GHz
RAM: 2x 4GB Ripjaws at 1600
GPU: Vapor X HD 7950 at 1025/1400 MHz

Running this game on 1080p at MAX setting at about 90 FPS (I set VSync On since my 120Hz monitor and the fps limit at 90 but it keeps going from 80 to 97)

[SammyDoge1]

its shitty optimized xD i5 3570K @4.5Ghz , SLI GTX770 ASUS Direct CU2, 16gig ram @ 1600, And it stutters like shit , meanwhile in BF i get 100+ FPS @ ultra >,>

[scotbud123]

This has probably been mentioned in the thread before but the game actually only needs 2GB of RAM to run. They purposely made it take more resources on purpose to promote idiot peasants buying the console version.

There's already a mod out to make it so it only needs 2GB to run.

Not to mention the FPS limit of 91 and the inability to modify the FOV, they want people to be peasants. Oh well, CoD sucks anyways.

[ImMalkah]

This has probably been mentioned in the thread before but the game actually only needs 2GB of RAM to run. They purposely made it take more resources on purpose to promote idiot peasants buying the console version.

There's already a mod out to make it so it only needs 2GB to run.

Not to mention the FPS limit of 91 and the inability to modify the FOV, they want people to be peasants. Oh well, CoD sucks anyways.

Well they sell probably 10x the amount of copies for consoles why would they even do any work on the PC version if it's not going to get them any money? Especially the fact that it's Infinity Shit.

[scotbud123]

Well they sell probably 10x the amount of copies for consoles why would they even do any work on the PC version if it's not going to get them any money? Especially the fact that it's Infinity Shit.

What other reason could they have for doing this? The game takes 2GB of RAM to run, yet they made it so people with 32-Bit computers for example CAN'T because of the "minimum requirements".

There's already a patch out to circumvent this and the people who made it even said that there was a bunch of useless shit in there that could have easily been removed. They either wanted to promoted the "ease" of the console versions, of they suffer from brain damage.

[ImMalkah]

What other reason could they have for doing this? The game takes 2GB of RAM to run, yet they made it so people with 32-Bit computers for example CAN'T because of the "minimum requirements".

There's already a patch out to circumvent this and the people who made it even said that there was a bunch of useless shit in there that could have easily been removed. They either wanted to promoted the "ease" of the console versions, of they suffer from brain damage.

Well to be fair the game does run just a tiny bit over 2GB so I'd say 3GB min.

[scotbud123]

Well to be fair the game does run just a tiny bit over 2GB so I'd say 3GB min.

Yeah but they listed 4GB as the min and recommend 8GB, which is utter bullshit. It also won't run with someone who is using a 32-Bit system with 4 GBs because it registers as just under 4GB because of 32-Bit Windows limitations.

It's just really fucky for people with slightly dated computers that would otherwise have fun with the game. (And can with a 3rd party patch).

[ImMalkah]

Yeah but they listed 4GB as the min and recommend 8GB, which is utter bullshit. It also won't run with someone who is using a 32-Bit system with 4 GBs because it registers as just under 4GB because of 32-Bit Windows limitations.

It's just really fucky for people with slightly dated computers that would otherwise have fun with the game. (And can with a 3rd party patch).

No, minimum was 6GB and recommended was 8GB .