Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345
Results 61 to 65 of 65
  1. #61
    Ethereal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Gender
    male
    Posts
    13,715
    Reputation
    2077
    Thanks
    3,264
    My Mood
    Amused
    I fully support this idea brought by the op which I will add for once made some Goddamn sense.
    This is original and will end those shitty, "derp this guy for cs" threads.
    You hit neg 100 you deserve to be eating a face full of forum dick.
    I normally don't even bother involving myself with these types of threads, but this really is a good idea.
    In the end, it will be good for the forum. You'll see better quality threads, because +rep will mean something again.
    Right now it really doesn't mean shit. If you bring negative back, eventually these little shit stains will want to bat with the big boys and post quality.

  2. #62
    Deflorate.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Gender
    male
    Location
    I CLOSE MY EYESE AND SEIZE IT
    Posts
    3,654
    Reputation
    850
    Thanks
    869
    Quote Originally Posted by Ethereal View Post
    I fully support this idea brought by the op which I will add for once made some Goddamn sense.
    This is original and will end those shitty, "derp this guy for cs" threads.
    You hit neg 100 you deserve to be eating a face full of forum dick.
    I normally don't even bother involving myself with these types of threads, but this really is a good idea.
    In the end, it will be good for the forum. You'll see better quality threads, because +rep will mean something again.
    Right now it really doesn't mean shit. If you bring negative back, eventually these little shit stains will want to bat with the big boys and post quality.
    Yes, because all the 12 year olds will learn to post quality threads.

    kk.

    Just because someone is CS, they're not going to stop making shit threads.

    Plus the fact that if this idea was implemented, half of General or more would be CS in within a week.

    Woohoo, more CS!

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to Deflorate. For This Useful Post:

    [MPGH]AVGN (11-09-2013)

  4. #63
    Ethereal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Gender
    male
    Posts
    13,715
    Reputation
    2077
    Thanks
    3,264
    My Mood
    Amused
    Quote Originally Posted by Defloration. View Post


    Yes, because all the 12 year olds will learn to post quality threads.

    kk.

    Just because someone is CS, they're not going to stop making shit threads.

    Plus the fact that if this idea was implemented, half of General or more would be CS in within a week.

    Woohoo, more CS!
    I'm perfectly fine with half of General sucking my cock.

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to Ethereal For This Useful Post:

    Euphemistic (11-09-2013)

  6. #64
    Thunder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Gender
    male
    Location
    North
    Posts
    13,773
    Reputation
    2920
    Thanks
    3,655
    10/10 would derep so many ******s

    [X]
    Crossfire minion since 06-12-2011
    Minecraft minion since 06-20-2011
    Moderator since 08-17-2011
    Global Moderator since 09-10-2011
    Super User since 08-27-2012
    [X] [X] [X]

  7. #65
    MrSanderValdur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Gender
    male
    Posts
    27
    Reputation
    10
    Thanks
    0
    I'm certain that 1000 negative is a bit better, than 100, because people can easily abuse it.

    But, diffidently a good idea, but... It all depends how Dabe, Arun is feeling, I bet 50% of a change, that this idea wont be added in anyway.

Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345

Similar Threads

  1. highest negative rep
    By Sev. in forum General
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 06-10-2012, 01:10 PM
  2. Sigh negative rep :'(
    By verno1 in forum Staff Disputes
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-24-2012, 08:05 PM
  3. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 05-06-2012, 05:37 PM
  4. Replies: 51
    Last Post: 05-20-2011, 08:50 PM
  5. Give me Negative Rep!!
    By Lonesome Cowboy in forum General
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 09-12-2010, 03:32 AM