What if aqw did this to stop botters?

[darklight1997]

What if aqw removed and switched to there old respawn system of the player manually clicking everytime they died?

would that not remove A LOT of botting?

[TheFrikinAsian]

There are so many things that AE could do to stop botting. They know their weak points. This being a possibility, another being an actual cooldown for logging back in.

[Jhem]

There are so many things that AE could do to stop botting. They know their weak points. This being a possibility, another being an actual cooldown for logging back in.

yeah, so true but I think, AE didn't do it because they know that almost 95% of AQW players are botter.

[Eternity]

You stole the words right outta my mouth jhem. <.<

They keep saying crap about botting in DN but dont do crap about it

[TheFrikinAsian]

yeah, so true but I think, AE didn't do it because they know that almost 95% of AQW players are botter.

95% is a bit much.

[Eternity]

95% is a bit much.

The number is close enough

[Paradox_x]

Necro heal dont die

[Eternity]

They don't die,but they can die.

Example why they would die:
Lag
Too many enemy (some place all enemy attack you if you move)
If your heal is really small, and your enemy attack is larger then your heal you would die.

[Oliboli8769]

My answer has pretty much been summed up already,
but I just wanted to add that a few private servers have already prevented bot clients temporarily.
I looked at what they did and it was actually extremely simple and easy to get past, but the point is that it would have taken
them around five minutes to do and prevented all botting on the server for a long time until someone actually looks into it and releases a fix.

This isn't what they did, but as an example they could easily change the name of the attack function in their code and all bots would be useless.
Sure, it would be annoying to do, but technically it would work.


-edit-
And about the respawn thing, no, that wouldn't change anything

[Eternity]

Mhmm....
Ok.

[Jhem]

Mhmm....
Ok.

No comments?