Practicing New Style

[Mr.Seyeko]

[Deflorate.]

The linework on the render looks decent, some of it could use a little brushing up on. Everything seems way too sharp, and overall quality seems to be a bit low.

Other than that, it just feels empty.

[Elocrypt.]

Can you do a speedart sometime? I am really interested in how you are doing this. I'm always open to learn new things.

[IV2B]

As always, your works are pretty nice.
I do like those sharp lines, yet the image itself feels empty and the colors are too distracting imo.
I dislike the text tho.

[Mr.Seyeko]

As always, your works are pretty nice.
I do like those sharp lines, yet the image itself feels empty and the colors are too distracting imo.
I dislike the text tho.

Wow was not expecting that from you xD
Thanks man.. Yeah its a new style i've been trying to master.. and i hate the text too thats why on my DA i put it without.
i wasn't sure what else to put in the background.

[IV2B]

Wow was not expecting that from you xD
Thanks man.. Yeah its a new style i've been trying to master.. and i hate the text too thats why on my DA i put it without.
i wasn't sure what else to put in the background.

Why weren't you? :O My worst CnC about your works was about the repetition of similiar designs.

Btw, as for the background, go for your usual works, but also implement those sharp lines on the render. However, you must pay attention to the blending.
A cool thing you can do is to have those lines "interact" with the background.
One sweet example would have having a background with any source of liquid (lake,sea,etc) then having those lines really close to it and having them to "dissolve" into it (just like putting a dirty brush into a cup of water).

I'd be curious how your wall-e image (page 3 of your DA) would look if you added this style in it. (and removed the topaz)


P.s. I'm interested in the image purely for how those lines look, the general composition of the image is lacking a little.

[[MPGH]Doc]

10/10 for effort. Keep practising. Good style.

[Gray]

Good to see that you're expanding your visions.
However, this sort of feels like your old style but with a little bit less clutter.

You're on your way, keep practicing.

[Fucking Moron]

Good to see that you're expanding your visions.
However, this sort of feels like your old style but with a little bit less clutter.

You're on your way, keep practicing.

Old style??

There is no such thing as style, there is only and always be ideas, and uhh idk this is false just tried to sound philosophic xD

[Gray]

Old style??

There is no such thing as style, there is only and always be ideas, and uhh idk this is false just tried to sound philosophic xD

A style is what I call a personal way of doing things that defines who you are and what your art looks or sound like.
Me for example, my imagery is desaturated, filled with contrast and if anything it's somber and tilting towards horror and macabre.

[Ryan]

A style is what I call a personal way of doing things that defines who you are and what your art looks or sound like.
Me for example, my imagery is desaturated, filled with contrast and if anything it's somber and tilting towards horror and macabre.

I'm of a similar mindset, but with a few caveats. For someone to have their own style, it has to profoundly different from anything anyone else does. Unless you're doing something not seen before in use of resources, concept, execution, and composition, it's not your style.

In this case, I see lots of elements I've seen before. Does that mean it's bad? No. Does that mean it's unique and his own style? Also no.

[IV2B]

False, a style is simply a way of doing something.
Be it yours or somebody else's, it doesn't matter as a style isn't tied to its former owner.

1. The way in which something is said, done, expressed, or performed.
2. The combination of distinctive features of literary or artistic expression, execution, or performance characterizing a particular person, group, school, or era.
3. A quality of imagination and individuality expressed in one's actions and tastes.

[Mr.Seyeko]

I'm of a similar mindset, but with a few caveats. For someone to have their own style, it has to profoundly different from anything anyone else does. Unless you're doing something not seen before in use of resources, concept, execution, and composition, it's not your style.

In this case, I see lots of elements I've seen before. Does that mean it's bad? No. Does that mean it's unique and his own style? Also no.

Lol... it is my own style.. doesn't matter which way you look at it.. IV2B is spot on.

[DroppedBombs]

I like your style. Nice work.

[Gray]

I'm of a similar mindset, but with a few caveats. For someone to have their own style, it has to profoundly different from anything anyone else does. Unless you're doing something not seen before in use of resources, concept, execution, and composition, it's not your style.

In this case, I see lots of elements I've seen before. Does that mean it's bad? No. Does that mean it's unique and his own style? Also no.

Nowhere did I say it's bad. Art is always considered and rated by its viewer, which can be interpreted in billions of ways.
I just think that the proper way of rating someones works is subjective. Vision, originality, technique and impact.
Which then again is rated by its viewer, so it will come out differently almost every time.