XP and tampering addresses

[rgerogerg]

0x14A821B70 is the address for data validation, and 0x147234589L is the address for XP.

[distiny]

0x14A821B70 is the address for data validation, and 0x147234589L is the address for XP.

0x147234589L someone is using reflector to steal our shit... the L gave it away bimbo

[SammyDoge1]

Glad you could not find it by yourself

[Azsry]

Both have already been found by others but okay.

[distiny]

the address from XP not afaik but this skid above use a decompiling program to extract that info from Sammy's cheat and tries to claim it as his own find...

The L at the back of the address is typical for reflector(decompiling a .net prog). and the guy's attitude is why most tend to obfuscate,pack their releases which can result in false positives and why most don't even bother anymore releasing or teaching stuff.

[KingX735]

the address from XP not afaik but this skid above use a decompiling program to extract that info from Sammy's cheat and tries to claim it as his own find...

The L at the back of the address is typical for reflector(decompiling a .net prog). and the guy's attitude is why most tend to obfuscate,pack their releases which can result in false positives and why most don't even bother anymore releasing or teaching stuff.

Well in my opinion it shouldn't be a problem if he create a trainer or share it and give at least credits.

[SammyDoge1]

Well in my opinion it shouldn't be a problem if he create a trainer or share it and give at least credits.

I would not mind if some one used my addresses , but at least give proper credits.

[distiny]

Well in my opinion it shouldn't be a problem if he create a trainer or share it and give at least credits.

and give at least credits. this being the crucial part imo.

[rgerogerg]

I would not mind if some one used my addresses , but at least give proper credits.

Then why not make it public to begin with?

[NightmareTX_RETIRED]

the address from XP not afaik but this skid above use a decompiling program to extract that info from Sammy's cheat and tries to claim it as his own find...

The L at the back of the address is typical for reflector(decompiling a .net prog). and the guy's attitude is why most tend to obfuscate,pack their releases which can result in false positives and why most don't even bother anymore releasing or teaching stuff.

That is why I obfuscate all my projects. Small or Big.

[distiny]

Then why not make it public to begin with?

That's his choice, like it as your choice to use a program to extract the address without the use of any skill whatsoever and claim it as your own find.
gtfo

[SammyDoge1]

Then why not make it public to begin with?

Why make the address public instead of a user friendly tool? i don't see everyone releasing a tool also release the addresses for it.

[rgerogerg]

That is why I obfuscate all my projects. Small or Big.

And will that stop someone from decompiling your app who really wants to?

[distiny]

Go ahead, try it. You won't get much out of it anyway.. you even forgot to remove the L at the end of the address lol

Yer a real badass yo

[NightmareTX_RETIRED]

And will that stop someone from decompiling your app who really wants to?

you will get something like this:



Even I don't know what part of Visual Tool is that.