New hack?

[randomnamekabe]

Randomhacker was a choob until he spammed the shit out of all the forums and got his post count up ridicousely quick

[Tooks]

You are very right and logical. I like how you think

If you were being sarcastic, thank you.

If you were being serious, thank you.

[JIGS4W]

If you were being sarcastic, thank you.

If you were being serious, thank you.

Im not being sarcastic... You are a smart thinker

Randomhacker was a choob until he spammed the shit out of all the forums and got his post count up ridicousely quick

I didn't even care about MPGH until to like the 3rd week I joined. My activity level was staying nice and still at 3% then I started picking up and comment a lot on the hack threads cuz I download every hack that people says that it works. Then for like 4 weeks CA section is all I go I didn't go anywhere

[randomnamekabe]

You have a 1400 posts in less than 4 months.
I mean WOW

[JIGS4W]

You have a 1400 posts in less than 4 months.
I mean WOW

You should have a look at Jimmydang then

I started focusing on MPGH when Gordon released his hack and in every game theres at least like 5 hackers. I quit CA so I go on MPGH plus I go on everyday spent a few hours on it

[Tooks]

Im not being sarcastic... You are a smart thinker



I didn't even care about MPGH until to like the 3rd week I joined. My activity level was staying nice and still at 3% then I started picking up and comment a lot on the hack threads cuz I download every hack that people says that it works. Then for like 4 weeks CA section is all I go I didn't go anywhere

Well, then hopefully the rest or at least the majority of the community will open their eyes and see the same way. It would improve the site as a whole, imo...

[toxicrazor]

i think you guys are straying from the point of this post... I mean I think you guys should talk more about how to find this new hack and where to get it.

[toxicrazor]

Tooks, did you ever find out what site the new hack came from?

[Tooks]

i think you guys are straying from the point of this post... I mean I think you guys should talk more about how to find this new hack and where to get it.

This person has the right idea...

Tooks, did you ever find out what site the new hack came from?

Negative, I would share it otherwise.

[toxicrazor]

Please do put up where to get it once you do find out where it is from

[Tooks]

Please do put up where to get it once you do find out where it is from

I'll find a way to share it with you guys without MPGH interfering, should I come across it.

Here's what I think should be changed:

Instead of automatically disapproving a new working hack just because of an ad, simply require that the person releasing the hack must let it be publicly known in the thread that it contains an ad. The person releasing the hacks should also state what the ad is for and what website it is advertising.

Hacks should only be disapproved if they are fake or dangerous.

This way, the community takes it upon themselves to choose what they download and if they care if the hack contains ads or not. If a hack is released that contains ads, you may still download it if you wish and more people can go on hacking happily.

Does this not seem fair?

[toxicrazor]

absolutely

[Tooks]

absolutely

There's one person who agrees.

Anyone else?

[JIGS4W]

I'll find a way to share it with you guys without MPGH interfering, should I come across it.

Here's what I think should be changed:

Instead of automatically disapproving a new working hack just because of an ad, simply require that the person releasing the hack must let it be publicly known in the thread that it contains an ad. The person releasing the hacks should also state what the ad is for and what website it is advertising.

Hacks should only be disapproved if they are fake or dangerous.

This way, the community takes it upon themselves to choose what they download and if they care if the hack contains ads or not. If a hack is released that contains ads, you may still download it if you wish and more people can go on hacking happily.

Does this not seem fair?

I do agree with you Tooks. Convinced . It does makes MPGH a bit fairer and better

[Tooks]

I do agree with you Tooks. Convinced . It does makes MPGH a bit fairer and better

Thank you, randomhacker.