So we have left BLM and are trying to figure out who is more unscientific? Cool.
The Liberals' War on Science:
If conservatives have declared a war on science, then progressives have declared Armageddon. On energy issues, for example, progressive liberals tend to be antinuclear because of the waste-disposal problem, anti–fossil fuels because of global warming, anti hydroelectric because dams disrupt river ecosystems, and anti–wind power because of avian fatalities. The underlying current is “everything natural is good” and “everything unnatural is bad.” Solar is of course the be all end all of clean energy for the liberal. To bad it's so damn expensive, expensive to store, and unreliable. Unless of course you get the government to subsidize it by taking money from some people and giving it to others.
The left is fixated on the environment, leading to an almost religious fervor over the purity and sanctity of air, water and especially food. Try having a conversation with a liberal progressive about GMOs—genetically modified organisms.
Modern environmentalism perpetuates myths about the inorganic world and the evils of Big Pharma. It’s adherents are just as likely to be in conflict with settled science as anyone else. Thus we end up with the liberal leaning anti-vaxers.
Did I miss anything? Wonder how much science matters to BLM folks?