yeah the 2 new weapons on CA i have them both and use them alot the mac-10 is better than the ump by a long shot and if you know how to use the m14 it will tear anything apart what do you thnik bout them?
I looked at the comparison charts for the M14 and the K2.. and the M14 is friggin scary. However, the M14 was lacking badly in fire rate. Also, just out of no particular reason, the M14 battle rifle (yep. It's a proper battle rifle) is a battle rifle because it uses the full 7.62x51mm round. It's got a standard working parts layout with the magazine in front of the grip and has a long barrel. And it would have to have semi-automatic firing modes because in Vietnam when they used it, the soldiers couldn't actually control a fully automatic M14 really well. The 7.62x51mm round was too powerful.
Also, is there are particular cut-off in trading fire rate for power / accuracy and vice versa ?
Last edited by RSMEyre; 10-17-2008 at 05:00 AM.
Reason: Cause I know.
Really if your gunna use the M-14... You gotta scope with it... It's almost impossible to shoot straight at somebody wihtout going insane. And buy an iTech or Something similar, ACOG can do the job, but not as well. BUt it is amazing, by a longshot, espiecially for sniping.
I liked the Mac-10. But it's gay how the avatar holds it, Mac should be 1 hander... Stupid Nexon.
it can be either or, and with one handed the recoil and aim would be out the roof.