Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst ... 4567 LastLast
Results 76 to 90 of 96
  1. #76
    Obey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Gender
    male
    Location
    The Magical Mushroom
    Posts
    24,734
    Reputation
    878
    Thanks
    3,451
    My Mood
    Buzzed
    Quote Originally Posted by Eminem View Post
    about the radiation , if it gets into the atmosphere then alot of ppl will be fked but it would probably need a big nuclear explosion to do that .
    Actually, as the radiation moves more in the air, is starts to be less effective, as to why it won't harm the US.

  2. #77
    deadskulzz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Gender
    male
    Posts
    802
    Reputation
    25
    Thanks
    49
    My Mood
    Devilish
    Quote Originally Posted by Eminem View Post
    the earth changed alot trough all these millions of years so it will keep changing even if you like it or not .
    no shit.

    Quote Originally Posted by Eminem View Post
    about the radiation , if it gets into the atmosphere then alot of ppl will be fked but it would probably need a big nuclear explosion to do that .
    again, no shit.
    but as danny said, the further rad. spreads, the less affective it will be.

    Quote Originally Posted by epicfailure/ View Post
    so wht?

    Google maps is gunna be fucked. 'Bout it.
    Get the fuck out.

    Quote Originally Posted by Danny View Post
    Actually, as the radiation moves more in the air, is starts to be less effective, as to why it won't harm the US.
    explosive shit and vomiting.

  3. #78
    Drake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Gender
    male
    Location
    Belgium,Oost-Vlaanderen
    Posts
    12,685
    Reputation
    1801
    Thanks
    4,878
    well in our news(or documentairy ) they said that when there is a big explosion there would be a big chance of a nuclear disaster that would affect the west coast and china .

    ps ; im not saying that ppl would die in america
    Last edited by Drake; 03-15-2011 at 01:21 PM.

  4. #79
    deadskulzz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Gender
    male
    Posts
    802
    Reputation
    25
    Thanks
    49
    My Mood
    Devilish
    once again, no shit.

    Explostions cause earch quakes, japans' been hit with an earthquake, look what happend.

  5. #80
    Drake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Gender
    male
    Location
    Belgium,Oost-Vlaanderen
    Posts
    12,685
    Reputation
    1801
    Thanks
    4,878
    explosions dont cause earthquakes ....

    earthquakes are caused by moving earth plates .

    sry if i missunderstanded it .

  6. #81
    deadskulzz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Gender
    male
    Posts
    802
    Reputation
    25
    Thanks
    49
    My Mood
    Devilish
    Quote Originally Posted by Eminem View Post
    explosions dont cause earthquakes ....

    earthquakes are caused by moving earth plates .

    sry if i missunderstanded it .
    the sudden force can cause an earthquake.

    Im almost postive, time to goodle.


    Q: Can nuclear explosions cause earthquakes?

    A: On January 19, 1968, a thermonuclear test, codenamed Faultless, took place in the Central Nevada Supplemental Test Area. The codename turned out to be a poor choice of words because a fresh fault rupture some 1200 meters long was produced. Seismographic records showed that the seismic waves produced by the fault movement were much less energetic than those produced directly by the nuclear explosion.

    Analysis of local seismic recordings (within a couple of miles) of nuclear tests at the Nevada Test Site shows that some tectonic stress is released simultaneously with the explosion. Analysis of the seismic wavefield generated by the blast shows the source can be characterized as 70-80 percent dilational (explosive-like) and 20-30 percent deviatoric (earthquake-like). The rock in the vicinity of the thermonuclear device is shattered by the passage of the explosions shock wave. This releases the elastic strain energy that was stored in the rock and adds an earthquake-like component to the seismic wavefield. The possibility of large Nevada Test Site nuclear explosions triggering damaging earthquakes in California was publicly raised in 1969. As a test of this possibility, rate of earthquake occurrence in northern California (magnitude 3.5 and larger) and the known times of the six largest thermonuclear tests (1965-1969) were plotted and it was obvious that no peaks in the seismicity occur at the times of the explosions. This is in agreement with theoretical calculations that transient strain from underground thermonuclear explosions is not sufficiently large to trigger fault rupture at distances beyond a few tens of kilometers from the shot point.

    The Indian and Pakastani test sites are approximately 1000 km from the recent Afghanistan earthquake epicenter. The question that has been asked is whether or not the occurrence of these nuclear tests influenced the occurrence of the large earthquake in Afghanistan. The most direct cause-effect relationship is that the passage of the seismic waves, generated by the thermonuclear explosion, through the epicentral region in Afghanistan somehow triggered the earthquake. For example, following the occurrence of the magnitude 7.3 Landers earthquake in southern California on June 28, 1992, the rate of seismicity in several seismically active regions in the western US, as far as 1250 km from the epicenter, abruptly increased coincident with the passage of the earthquake generated seismic wavefield through each site. The abrupt increases in seismicity occurred primarily in regions of geothermal activity and recent volcanism. The mechanism by which this occurred remains unknown. The Afghanistan earthquake occurred at 06:22:28 UT on May 30, 1998 and the thermonuclear test most closely associated in time occurred at 06:55 UT or after the occurrence of the earthquake. The other nuclear tests occurred 2-20 days before the earthquake.

    The elastic strains induced in the epicentral region by the passage of the seismic wavefield generated by the largest of the nuclear tests, the May 11 Indian test with an estimated yield of 40 kilotons, is about 100 times smaller than the strains induced by the Earth's semi-diurnal (12 hour) tides that are produced by the gravitational fields of the Moon and the Sun. If small nuclear tests could trigger an earthquake at a distance of 1000 km, equivalent-sized earthquakes, which occur globally at a rate of several per day, would also be expected to trigger earthquakes. No such triggering has been observed. Thus there is no evidence of a causal connection between the nuclear testing and the large earthquake in Afghanistan and it is pure coincidence that they occurred near in time and location.

    One last point. The largest underground thermonuclear tests conducted by the US were detonated in Amchitka at the western end of the Aleutian Islands and the largest of these was the 5 megaton codename Cannikin test which occurred on November 6, 1971. Cannikin had a body wave magnitude of 6.9 and it did not trigger any earthquakes in the seismically active Aleutian Islands. Suggested reading: "Nuclear Explosions and Earthquake, the Parted Veil", by Bruce A. Bolt, W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, 1976. (UC Berkeley)

    i ment google.

  7. #82
    Drake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Gender
    male
    Location
    Belgium,Oost-Vlaanderen
    Posts
    12,685
    Reputation
    1801
    Thanks
    4,878
    yeah it can caus an earthquake but then u would need a nuclear bomb , wich has bad effects on the earth , i makes the ground "radioactive" and that ground is unable to use for a lot of thousand years .

    normal/natural earthquakes are cause by moving earthplates who crash into eachother . or move agiants eachother

    ------------------->
    <-----------------


    or

    |
    |
    |
    |
    V
    ^
    |
    |
    |
    |


  8. #83
    Obey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Gender
    male
    Location
    The Magical Mushroom
    Posts
    24,734
    Reputation
    878
    Thanks
    3,451
    My Mood
    Buzzed
    We'll have to see what happens I guess, hopefully they can get things together.. but the way things are looking is that their could be a meltdown... hopefully not... but lets hope for the best.

  9. #84
    deadskulzz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Gender
    male
    Posts
    802
    Reputation
    25
    Thanks
    49
    My Mood
    Devilish
    Quote Originally Posted by Eminem View Post
    yeah it can caus an earthquake but then u would need a nuclear bomb , wich has bad effects on the earth , i makes the ground "radioactive" and that ground is unable to use for a lot of thousand years .

    normal/natural earthquakes are cause by moving earthplates who crash into eachother . or move agiants eachother

    ------------------->
    <-----------------


    or

    |
    |
    |
    |
    V
    ^
    |
    |
    |
    |

    ....no, shit.

    when enough radiation gets evaporated, that causes acid rain, killing tons more. Plus couds travel, spreading acid rain all around the earth for mother nature to enjoy

  10. #85
    Obey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Gender
    male
    Location
    The Magical Mushroom
    Posts
    24,734
    Reputation
    878
    Thanks
    3,451
    My Mood
    Buzzed
    Hopefully no acid rain in Detroit

  11. #86
    deadskulzz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Gender
    male
    Posts
    802
    Reputation
    25
    Thanks
    49
    My Mood
    Devilish
    Quote Originally Posted by Danny View Post
    Hopefully no acid rain in Detroit
    now we just need a nuke.

    North Korea

  12. #87
    Heartview's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Gender
    male
    Location
    KY Cygni
    Posts
    9,208
    Reputation
    717
    Thanks
    2,876
    Nuclear explosion != Nuclear powerplant meltdown. It would take a lot of power to cause an earthquake, let alone one of an 8.9 magnitude. (iirc 8.9) There have been bigger explosions than nuclear ones that have not had effects like that.
    Texture Mods


    Obedear, the sky is low

  13. #88
    Drake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Gender
    male
    Location
    Belgium,Oost-Vlaanderen
    Posts
    12,685
    Reputation
    1801
    Thanks
    4,878
    New Subject :
    well i guess we will be fine as logn as the earth dont get hit by a meteorite , because a meteorite would cause a very big claud that would block the sun from shining on the earth , so no sun , no life .

  14. #89
    Ariez's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Gender
    male
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    2,371
    Reputation
    69
    Thanks
    135
    My Mood
    Buzzed
    Hmm our planet is spinning faster and we're closer to the UK... so day and night will go faster =/ that doesn't sound suckish, except for the US closer to UK thing.

  15. #90

Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst ... 4567 LastLast