Thread: Not guilty?

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 63
  1. #16
    WOLFPACK X69X's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Gender
    male
    Location
    space bound....
    Posts
    4,592
    Reputation
    194
    Thanks
    382
    My Mood
    Crappy
    Quote Originally Posted by dw3fan View Post
    NO you are not allowed to make a verdict on common sense.... or else both OJ simpson and Casey would have been guilty. We just dont know the truth and we will never know so its not guilty by constitution. The duct tape and smell of decomposition isnt hardcore evidence that can make someone think she did it for sure. PPL like u are judging in a case when u are only supposed to use evidence. Go study law and make a verdict on this case by following every step of law and the constitution then come back telling me shes guilty....
    need reading it all just saying the truth hopefully comes out before she is dead. and if we didn't have to go by the constitution in this fucking trial your ass wouldn't be saying this. your just a mr know it all right now.

  2. #17
    Disturbed 24/7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Gender
    male
    Location
    my house.
    Posts
    2,432
    Reputation
    34
    Thanks
    416
    My Mood
    Twisted
    since there is no proof and we might never know 100% whether she did it or not, God knows and if she did do it, He will determine what happens after she dies...

    and for those who dont believe in God: we dont know 100% if she is guilty r not, and might never know, but its not really our business anyways so y does everyone care...?

  3. #18
    Dested's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Gender
    male
    Location
    The Six
    Posts
    2,823
    Reputation
    10
    Thanks
    198
    My Mood
    Yeehaw
    Quote Originally Posted by XxAussy1995xX View Post


    need reading it all just saying the truth hopefully comes out before she is dead. and if we didn't have to go by the constitution in this fucking trial your ass wouldn't be saying this. your just a mr know it all right now.
    wtf are u retarted or something. Mr know it all? I learned about court and Law in 8th grade. EVERY CASE requires the use of constitution not my fucking fault. You have to chose a verdict this way not by being a moron like you and saying shes guilty because of ur "common sense" or emotions with no fucking proof

    Subscribe + Rate!

  4. #19
    Wretched's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Gender
    male
    Location
    ☣ ☠ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ
    Posts
    3,034
    Reputation
    4
    Thanks
    179
    My Mood
    Daring
    Ignorance.
    There is no proof that she actually murdered her own daughter.
    Just because she was accused, you here "Mother murdered daughter" and you blindly accuse her of the act, without any consideration.
    She could of, or couldn't of. Since there is no evidence of whoever killed her yet, maybe it was somebody else, or maybe it was the mother.
     

  5. #20
    fcmclan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Gender
    male
    Location
    somewhere wit lotzo girlzz
    Posts
    1,361
    Reputation
    2
    Thanks
    41
    My Mood
    Breezy
    constitutions should include a clause called common sense :/
    Epic Quote:

    Sure there have been injuries and deaths in boxing - but none of them serious."
    - Alan Minter, Boxer

    I iz sexy!

    Asian girlz r the BEST!!! among all and dont dare to say they arent till u in bed with one





    JOIN!

    https://www.mpgh.net/forum/groups/we-hate-route66.html

  6. #21
    Dested's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Gender
    male
    Location
    The Six
    Posts
    2,823
    Reputation
    10
    Thanks
    198
    My Mood
    Yeehaw
    OJ killed a white bitch for cheating on him. Thats common sense right? But he gets not guilty because of crappy evidence and no true proof that he did it. I bet the juriors for both OJ and Casey think she did it but cannot use their common sense they must use law.

    Subscribe + Rate!

  7. #22
    B0ttl3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Gender
    male
    Posts
    465
    Reputation
    13
    Thanks
    33
    My Mood
    Cynical
    Quote Originally Posted by dw3fan View Post
    NOT guilty is the right verdict. The burden of proof is on prosecutions side and prosecution had No Real evidence Casey murdered her. You cant just get the emotions of the jury with pics and shit with no real evidence... Jose Baez did a great job in saying "If you dont know who killed Caylee 100% Then Casey is not guilty." I studied this stuff a while back and I think the verdict is absolutely right and ppl are just pissed cause they wanted to see her die for entertainment and shit. This should have never been a high profile case. There is no real evidence she killed her and by LAW you cannot judge someone by feeling, only by evidence. Our U.S. constitution saved her.....
    She had enough circumstantial evidence against her to convict Dillinger three times over.

    And he was assassinated.

    She should have been declared guilty. The defense played on the jury's doubt that a woman would murder her own child, and attacked her father instead.

    It was a circus trial, and I loathed every minute of it.
    Last edited by B0ttl3; 07-06-2011 at 12:10 AM.
    Quote of the week: "Others define me, but ever may I choose a different word."



    Quote Originally Posted by SkyLite View Post
    a great philosopher knows more than me in this
    @B0ttl3
    I can read your mind.

  8. #23
    Dested's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Gender
    male
    Location
    The Six
    Posts
    2,823
    Reputation
    10
    Thanks
    198
    My Mood
    Yeehaw
    Quote Originally Posted by B0ttl3 View Post
    She had enough circumstantial evidence against her to convict Dillinger three times over.

    And he was assassinated.
    haha showing pictures of her drunk and saying the car smelled like shit is circumstantial evidence? Ok then the pictures of Casey playing with her daughter and the videos of them playing and laughing is also evidence? Thats fucking bullshit. The best evidence in this case was the duct tape which cannot be proven that Casey placed it.

    Subscribe + Rate!

  9. #24
    Wretched's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Gender
    male
    Location
    ☣ ☠ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ
    Posts
    3,034
    Reputation
    4
    Thanks
    179
    My Mood
    Daring
    Quote Originally Posted by dw3fan View Post
    haha showing pictures of her drunk and saying the car smelled like shit is circumstantial evidence? Ok then the pictures of Casey playing with her daughter and the videos of them playing and laughing is also evidence? Thats fucking bullshit. The best evidence in this case was the duct tape which cannot be proven that Casey placed it.
    Thank you for what you've said.
    What @dw3fan is saying is true.
    U guys mad that a daughter has been murdered and the mother was wrongly accused?
     

  10. #25
    B0ttl3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Gender
    male
    Posts
    465
    Reputation
    13
    Thanks
    33
    My Mood
    Cynical
    Quote Originally Posted by dw3fan View Post
    haha showing pictures of her drunk and saying the car smelled like shit is circumstantial evidence? Ok then the pictures of Casey playing with her daughter and the videos of them playing and laughing is also evidence? Thats fucking bullshit. The best evidence in this case was the duct tape which cannot be proven that Casey placed it.

    You, apparently, don't have a grasp on what circumstantial evidence is.

    Unfortunately, they wanted hard evidence for a conviction. And, while I'm sure the innocent who are declared so are happy, it's very bitter when the guilty slip away.


    She denied that her child was missing.

    Later, she said the babysitter stole the child.

    Afterward, she admitted there was no babysitter, but she didn't know where the child was.

    After that, she blamed her parents, and said that they killed the baby. On accident.
    Quote of the week: "Others define me, but ever may I choose a different word."



    Quote Originally Posted by SkyLite View Post
    a great philosopher knows more than me in this
    @B0ttl3
    I can read your mind.

  11. #26
    Krypton1x's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Gender
    male
    Location
    Tacoma
    Posts
    13,305
    Reputation
    1184
    Thanks
    1,196
    My Mood
    Brooding
    poor little girl.

    i didn't follow the case enough to really judge the accused person.

  12. #27
    Empire's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Gender
    male
    Location
    .Alwayz.
    Posts
    19,896
    Reputation
    659
    Thanks
    1,346
    My Mood
    Pensive
    Problem is that you can't just accuse someone of a crime because they don't have an alibi.


  13. #28
    B0ttl3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Gender
    male
    Posts
    465
    Reputation
    13
    Thanks
    33
    My Mood
    Cynical
    Quote Originally Posted by Empire View Post
    Problem is that you can't just accuse someone of a crime because they don't have an alibi.
    However, when they have four and they constantly change...

    She was guilty. At the very least of a huge cover-up involving someone else's murder.

    But, circumstantial evidence. *shrug*
    Quote of the week: "Others define me, but ever may I choose a different word."



    Quote Originally Posted by SkyLite View Post
    a great philosopher knows more than me in this
    @B0ttl3
    I can read your mind.

  14. #29
    Smurfyv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Gender
    male
    Location
    -
    Posts
    7,703
    Reputation
    144
    Thanks
    480
    yep just because there 12

  15. #30
    alexzor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Gender
    male
    Posts
    350
    Reputation
    10
    Thanks
    32
    you had me at america.

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast