1. Just because a 10 to 1 reduction pattern emerges from the first 2 steps does not mean that it is the quantifying force. At a constant speed, the runner will overcome the Turtle no matter the situation.

2. Less of a paradox and more of a maths question, if you understand what's going on then you'll get it no bother.

3. Originally Posted by Youtro
It's not a paradox.. nor it's even a mathematical theory. Just because the distance between the runner and the turtle changed in a specific factor up to a particular point, You still cannot prove any pattern.
Did you even put any thought into that mind-numbingly stupid reply?

You might as well say "just because they are moving at constant velocities you can't prove they are moving at the same velocity at every position".

Originally Posted by Antipathy
You, are fucking stupid.
Of course he will run past him, it's not like he's slowing down his run the closer he gets to it.

Congratulations, nobody lost their mind, except for you, who clearly didn't have one to begin with.
You are stupid, it wasn't even me who thought up the paradox.

I KNOW HE WILL RUN PAST HIM, IDIOT, I STATED THAT IN MY FIRST POST. THIS IS A PARADOX, IN CASE YOU CAN'T READ.

Idiot, I lost a mind I didn't have? Seems logical.

4. Originally Posted by _corn_

Did you even put any thought into that mind-numbingly stupid reply?

You might as well say "just because they are moving at constant velocities you can't prove they are moving at the same velocity at every position".

You are stupid, it wasn't even me who thought up the paradox.

I KNOW HE WILL RUN PAST HIM, IDIOT, I STATED THAT IN MY FIRST POST. THIS IS A PARADOX, IN CASE YOU CAN'T READ.

Idiot, I lost a mind I didn't have? Seems logical.
Real life moving objects are not functions. You can't define a Y for every X..

5. Originally Posted by _corn_

Did you even put any thought into that mind-numbingly stupid reply?

You might as well say "just because they are moving at constant velocities you can't prove they are moving at the same velocity at every position".

You are stupid, it wasn't even me who thought up the paradox.

I KNOW HE WILL RUN PAST HIM, IDIOT, I STATED THAT IN MY FIRST POST. THIS IS A PARADOX, IN CASE YOU CAN'T READ.

Idiot, I lost a mind I didn't have? Seems logical.
About as logical as your post Mr. "I get angry when I browse the web".
I sense there's some panties in a bunch here somewhere, it appears to be yours.

6. The Following User Says Thank You to Xenocide For This Useful Post:

ThePixelJunk (10-23-2013)

7. Why should I lose my mind thinking about turtles n shit?

8. Originally Posted by Sound.
Why should I lose my mind thinking about turtles n shit?
It's because he's weakminded.

9. Originally Posted by Antipathy

It's because he's weakminded.
Yeah, that was my first thought when I read his "awesome paradox"

10. Originally Posted by Sound.

Yeah, that was my first thought when I read his "awesome paradox"
Oh, but it wasn't his.
He so intelligently stated it right here.

Originally Posted by _corn_
You are stupid, it wasn't even me who thought up the paradox.

I KNOW HE WILL RUN PAST HIM, IDIOT, I STATED THAT IN MY FIRST POST. THIS IS A PARADOX, IN CASE YOU CAN'T READ.

Idiot, I lost a mind I didn't have? Seems logical.
You know, it's intelligent in between the all caps rage and the two so called insults on top.
Idiot and stupid I am apparently. But by his standards I guess that's pretty good.
Considering the first post.

11. Originally Posted by Antipathy

Oh, but it wasn't his.
He so intelligently stated it right here.

You know, it's intelligent in between the all caps rage and the two so called insults on top.
Idiot and stupid I am apparently. But by his standards I guess that's pretty good.
Considering the first post.
Lol sorry for using capitals, I get mad when talking with douches on the internet (which there are plenty of).

12. Is he an athlete or just some person?

Average speed of turtle?
Of the human?

Flawed and failed.

Page 3 of 3 First 123