I'm suggesting that we have two types of bans that we can see when the user is banned because we only see the one image title. My suggestion is when a user is banned for scamming they have a different image title such as scammer as the image title and for regular bans we use the regular image title we already use.
Don't see why we would need to differentiate between the types of bans when often times a scammer wouldn't be returning after getting banned in the first place.
No for example you buy a service from a guy, later he gets banned(not scamming) you panic and react charging back and then the other guy get's their paypal limited causing confusion.
People wanna buy your service, but you're banned(1 day), so they don't purchase it even though you didn't scam
You contact seller and you show them your mpgh profile and whatever. One day later, the service person see's your banned and they think you're a scammer so they fuck up your refunds or whatever
The real question is why not? What's wrong with having two tags is just more specific.
When I first joined MPGH I never bought from anyone I saw who was banned (even though they were post banned). I didn't know of the post ban stuff till later on. I think this would be a good idea to have a post ban title.