Anyone have updated 31_0 bypass?

after searching old threads it appears none of the aob for 31_0 bypass works anymore...anyone have the updated one and is willing to share?

CF West

thx!

Code:

---

FE 40 19 8B 85 ?? ?? ?? ??

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Anger5K

Code:

---

FE 40 19 8B 85 ?? ?? ?? ??

---

---

What to do after finding the address:(

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by iamat123456

after searching old threads it appears none of the aob for 31_0 bypass works anymore...anyone have the updated one and is willing to share?

CF West

thx!

---

Code:

---

class GAMEPROTO_COMMON
{
public:
        char pad_0000[4];
        uint32_t mValidPacket;
        uint8_t mPacketSequence;
        uint8_t mPostEncryptKey;
        char pad_000A[2];
        uint32_t mPostEncrypt;
        uint32_t mValidEncryption;
        uint32_t mMagicNumber;

        virtual char __thiscall PreReadData(ILTMessage_Read*);
        virtual bool __thiscall PostReadData(ILTMessage_Read*);
        virtual char __thiscall PreWriteData(ILTMessage_Read*);
        virtual bool __thiscall PostWriteData(ILTMessage_Read*);
};

class GAMEPROTO_CS_WEAR_SACK_REQ : public GAMEPROTO_COMMON
{
public:
        char pad_0018[1];
        uint8_t N0000003C;

        virtual bool __thiscall ReadData(ILTMessage_Read*);
        virtual bool __thiscall WriteData(ILTMessage_Read*); //CS_WEAR_SACK_REQ
};

class GAMEPROTO_CS_CURRENT_WEAPON_CHECK_RES : public GAMEPROTO_COMMON
{
public:


        virtual bool __thiscall ReadData(ILTMessage_Read*);
        virtual bool __thiscall WriteData(ILTMessage_Read*); //Stop
};

bool CS_WEAR_SACK_REQ(GAMEPROTO_CS_WEAR_SACK_REQ* WEAR_SACK, ILTMessage_Read* Message)
{

        WEAR_SACK->N0000003C = 0;

        return gp_Table[MSG_CS_WEAR_SACK_REQ]->GetOriginal<bool(__thiscall*)(GAMEPROTO_CS_WEAR_SACK_REQ*, ILTMessage_Read*)>()(WEAR_SACK, Message);
}

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jayjay153

Code:

---

class GAMEPROTO_COMMON
{
public:
        char pad_0000[4];
        uint32_t mValidPacket;
        uint8_t mPacketSequence;
        uint8_t mPostEncryptKey;
        char pad_000A[2];
        uint32_t mPostEncrypt;
        uint32_t mValidEncryption;
        uint32_t mMagicNumber;

        virtual char __thiscall PreReadData(ILTMessage_Read*);
        virtual bool __thiscall PostReadData(ILTMessage_Read*);
        virtual char __thiscall PreWriteData(ILTMessage_Read*);
        virtual bool __thiscall PostWriteData(ILTMessage_Read*);
};

class GAMEPROTO_CS_WEAR_SACK_REQ : public GAMEPROTO_COMMON
{
public:
        char pad_0018[1];
        uint8_t N0000003C;

        virtual bool __thiscall ReadData(ILTMessage_Read*);
        virtual bool __thiscall WriteData(ILTMessage_Read*); //CS_WEAR_SACK_REQ
};

class GAMEPROTO_CS_CURRENT_WEAPON_CHECK_RES : public GAMEPROTO_COMMON
{
public:


        virtual bool __thiscall ReadData(ILTMessage_Read*);
        virtual bool __thiscall WriteData(ILTMessage_Read*); //Stop
};

bool CS_WEAR_SACK_REQ(GAMEPROTO_CS_WEAR_SACK_REQ* WEAR_SACK, ILTMessage_Read* Message)
{

        WEAR_SACK->N0000003C = 0;

        return gp_Table[MSG_CS_WEAR_SACK_REQ]->GetOriginal<bool(__thiscall*)(GAMEPROTO_CS_WEAR_SACK_REQ*, ILTMessage_Read*)>()(WEAR_SACK, Message);
}

---

---

What is this?:eek:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by yazigegeda

What is this?:eek:

---

Something that the pasters here shouldn't have

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by vaisefud3

Something that the pasters here shouldn't have

---

yyou are treating leechers as smart people , since when they understand what they cp...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 96neko

yyou are treating leechers as smart people , since when they understand what they cp...

---

Yeah, but the more ppl use, the more likely it is to get patched