The Atheist's view of how the Universe started

[[MPGH]Ethereal]

It explains how matter can't be created out of anything it is not stupid theory.The question is how can the universe be created out of nothing,what was before the big bang what created this mystical ball of energy the conversation can go on and on.What was before all of this .Mankind can never answer all of this.Lucky for me I believe in a God that created the universe.

The first law expresses that energy can be transformed, i.e. changed from one form to another, but cannot be created or destroyed. That which doesn't exist can't produce anything for it is without any energy...

Please tell me how this proves Gods existence..

[Paroxysm]

The first law expresses that energy can be transformed, i.e. changed from one form to another, but cannot be created or destroyed. That which doesn't exist can't produce anything for it is without any energy...

Please tell me how this proves Gods existence..

Typical creationist response:

"Well something had to make that energy, so God."

How that logical follows is beyond me, but assuming their using logic is perhaps a faulty assumption.

[dragon73]

The first law expresses that energy can be transformed, i.e. changed from one form to another, but cannot be created or destroyed.

What I'm trying to prove here is that matter or energy cannot be created out of nothing,so there must of been something there before this big eneryball matter that became the big bang. As I stated a while ago we can go on and on about what was before the big bang and where did existance come from and no of us would have an answer.That is unless we believe in a Supreme Being that made everything but then what created it or Him.It's a never ending question.That is why for me it's by Faith and personal experience that I believe in God.

[[MPGH]Ethereal]

The first law expresses that energy can be transformed, i.e. changed from one form to another, but cannot be created or destroyed.

What I'm trying to prove here is that matter or energy cannot be created out of nothing,so there must of been something there before this big eneryball matter that became the big bang. As I stated a while ago we can go on and on about what was before the big bang and where did existance come from and no of us would have an answer.That is unless we believe in a Supreme Being that made everything but then what created it or Him.It's a never ending question.That is why for me it's by Faith and personal experience that I believe in God.

It's funny how theists pick and choose which tenets of science best caters to their beliefs,
yet shun other science that is backed by irrefutable physical evidence.

As I said earlier, what you are presenting is a THEORY.
You have absolutely no evidence to back it.

[Empire]

It's funny how theists pick and choose which tenets of science best caters to their beliefs,
yet shun other science that is backed by irrefutable physical evidence.

As I said earlier, what you are presenting is a THEORY.
You have absolutely no evidence to back it.

Well the first law of thermodynamics isn't a theory, but his = god thing is a bit off.

[[MPGH]Ethereal]

Well the first law of thermodynamics isn't a theory, but his = god thing is a bit off.

I know that, I'm saying what he's getting out of the first law ie; "proves God" is just a theory.

[dragon73]

Well the first law of thermodynamics isn't a theory, but his = god thing is a bit off.

What I'm trying to get for any athiest to believe at least is ,Where did existance come from?In other words why does anything exsists?
I promiss this isn't a trap.I just want to see if any man can prove this.

[Ferris Bueller]

The Big Bang Theory is backed up with what evidence?
Hm let's see, nothing backs up God but the bible. Alright.
Do you know about the law of cause and effect?

both other religions believe and back up god
@Stifmeister

[Paroxysm]

What I'm trying to get for any athiest to believe at least is ,Where did existance come from?In other words why does anything exsists?
I promiss this isn't a trap.I just want to see if any man can prove this.

Things exist because an invisible pink unicorn willed it into existence and this is supported irrefutably because my holy books says it's irrefutable.

[dragon73]

Things exist because an invisible pink unicorn willed it into existence and this is supported irrefutably because my holy books says it's irrefutable.

You see I told you it wasn't a trap I was just going to say that we can at least agree that no man can prove existance and thats all.But funny remark

[Sir Nathan]

I know that, I'm saying what he's getting out of the first law ie; "proves God" is just a theory.

Big Bang is just a THEORY.





Hence the name 'Big Bang Theory'.

[Empire]

I know that, I'm saying what he's getting out of the first law ie; "proves God" is just a theory.

Well it would be worthy of the "God" title to say the least, but the bible's god.......very iffy on that one.

[Stifmeister]

What I'm trying to get for any athiest to believe at least is ,Where did existance come from?In other words why does anything exsists?
I promiss this isn't a trap.I just want to see if any man can prove this.

Law of cause and effect @dragon73

Aka. something can't come from nothing.
This is the thing most atheists use against Christians. That God couldn't have come from nothing. This is when they think they have won the argument, but yet they don't see the irony.
Their precious "Big Bang" supposedly created the Universe billions of years ago when there was NAUGHT (no matter, no hookers, no negros, no space, nothing).
If the Big Bang did happen from nothing, this means that it defied the law of cause and effect ... meaning that God CAN exist

inb4virtualparticles

Big Bang is just a THEORY.





Hence the name 'Big Bang Theory'.

>accepted theory
>used by 80% of new fag/stupid atheists who jump on the non-conformism bandwagon
@natiko

[Assalamu alaikum]

Big Bang is just a THEORY.





Hence the name 'Big Bang Theory'.

Way to state the obvious..did I ever say it wasn't a theory..?

Law of cause and effect @dragon73

Aka. something can't come from nothing.
This is the thing most atheists use against Christians. That God couldn't have come from nothing. This is when they think they have won the argument, but yet they don't see the irony.
Their precious "Big Bang" supposedly created the Universe billions of years ago when there was NAUGHT (no matter, no hookers, no negros, no space, nothing).
If the Big Bang did happen from nothing, this means that it defied the law of cause and effect ... meaning that God CAN exist

inb4virtualparticles




>accepted theory
>used by 80% of new fag/stupid atheists who jump on the non-conformism bandwagon
@natiko

How about nobody knows a Goddamn thing pertaining to how the universe was created.
That's the most realistic answer.
Creationist choose to believe it was a deity or higher power,
and Atheist believe there is a more scientific answer goverened by what humans are more familiar with: LOGIC

Simply put: This argument is like pissing into the wind.

[Sir Nathan]

Way to state the obvious..did I ever say it wasn't a theory..?



How about nobody knows a Goddamn thing pertaining to how the universe was created.
That's the most realistic answer.
Creationist choose to believe it was a deity or higher power,
and Atheist believe there is a more scientific answer goverened by what humans are more familiar with: LOGIC

Simply put: This argument is like pissing into the wind.

You stated that the argument which says that thermodynamics proves God's existence is just a theory, using the word 'just' as a connotation in a way to reduce value/crediability due to the fact that it's a mere theory. Big Bang is just a theory too, nevertheless it's the way you accept of how the universe started.