I don't think you comprehend what you are dribbling out onto this forum right now. People on this thread have openly challenged the initial premise. Understand? So that means there are now two party's that can argue on who is right. That would result in a debate. You on the other hand are making threads that people already agree on. So there is no debate if there is no second party that is openly challenging the initial premise of the thread. Understand? I don't know how many times I have to tell you that.
I didn't fucking say that if a small percentage of people agree on something, then the majority agrees. Are you illiterate? I said "if NOBODY is challenging the claim AND it is safe to presume that everyone agrees on it, there is no debate". I said AND you retard.