Grr, MPGH is being slow. (Which is why I am assuming the double post:P)
1. You CAN say that because something is that there is a reason/cause for it. You CAN'T say that because something is there is no reason/cause for it.
For instance, I can't say that since there is grass there is no God, because obviously since there is grass God could not possible exist. I can say, however, that since there is a God that there is grass. Because grass comes from God. And like I said, you don't have to agree that it is God, but you must agree that there is something that caused it. What came first the chicken or the egg? Well, its a paradox so the easiest conclusion is that there must be something that came before the chicken and the egg; God. (Or whatever you want to call it)
2. Thats your opinion. The religious man would claim the complete opposite. ie Miracles.
3. True, but is it? The religious man as shown in my examples were given a reason to live because of their faith and religion.
4. It built up society in that past. Without religion (religion, not God) we wouldn't be where we are now.
5. Give some examples. I'm happy with my moral code
6. Not true. Without religion and the moral code that my religion gives me (plus the moral code that God made in mankinds hearts) murder and the like would be way more rampant. I think I made mention of that in my last paragraph. Also, this thread isn't pointless. Your few silly sentences are a poor counter to a 5 page paper. C'mon, I thought you would do better than that! (I also thought you would be the only one to respond, lol)