I hate keyloggers

[FORCE™]

Don't approve this shit, wait till im unbanned.

Ok bossssssss

[LegendaryAbbo]

Don't approve this shit, wait till im unbanned.

I'll close it until your unbanned.

Oh and guys, that is Drake.

[Bombsaway707]

Tested and approved obama(drake)
Download at your own risk
/reopen

[Jarppi]

epic fail!

[Mouzie]

Tested and approved obama(drake)
Download at your own risk
/reopen

Thank you. :3

At your own risk?


Czewei.

[Ghost of Obama]

The I-Hate-Keyloggers application installs a dll file "kbhookdll.dll" that hooks to most system processes that are started even system critical ones when the "Typing Protection" is enabled. Disabling the Typing Protection unhooks the mentioned dll from the processes. Working in this manner the application strives to block keyloggers that are hook-based. This means also that the application may seem to give a "real-time" protection against keyloggers that tries to intercept keystrokes that are typed by the user. This kind of protection has therefore to be active in the background at all times. The application will however not be able to protect the user against "kernel-mode" rootkit keyloggers that can use a own driver in order to record the keystrokes etc. directly from the source. As the behavior of the I-Hate-Keyloggers application in some manner mimics the behavior/techniques of user mode rootkits(or usermode hook-based keyloggers) there is a risk that it ends up being detected by many vendors that detects/flags the application as bad or risky. This can be seen for example if scanning the installed files at online scanning services as for example virustotal.com


/Quoted from Lavasoft Research'


That explains it alot better than I can.