swiper no swiping!

[jiang]

 

idk i guess the term "vouch copy" means "free stuff" nowadays. i admit, i try to get free stuff sometimes, too, but i usually just get the vouch copy genuinely for the vouch copy. we have allura and predator for actual vouches now. we should establish a better system for this rather than just 1,500 posts so we don't have as many vouch whores as trol or freeze.

[71c]

know some young niggas like to swang

[Sinister]

It would be better if just staff would get vouch copies tbh

[Trol553]

It would be better if just staff would get vouch copies tbh

Not really.

Slovakia ??





@ @savage am I whore ? How so ? I post HQ vouch copy reviews and it is up to you if you give to me or not lulz and I do not have 1500 post

[Raple]

I have always believed the vouch copy system is systematically flawed, as any schmuck with 1500 posts (which is a lot of the current, active userbase) can claim as much free shit as possible as long as they meet the very simple requirements and are in the right place at the right time.

Personally, I believe the requirements should either be more strict or there needs some sort of way to show who is a legitimate, high quality voucher (like Predator, Allura, etc). I think it would be easy enough to have an official list of users who have taken the vouch copy protocol to a much higher standard, perhaps a sticky in the marketplace or users services section? @Hova @Psychotic

Honestly, we could even make a rank for it but I think that would be a tad too far. There is a lot more that should go into a vouch copy than simply "oh, ya i got it good one". If you are getting a product worth several hundred dollars and the seller could provide it with ease, the review should reflect that fact. It most certainly needs to stem from good language arts and grammar, but as well as describe the process as a whole for other buyers.

tl;dr, vouch copy system needs a revamp.

[Trol553]

I have always believed the vouch copy system is systematically flawed, as any schmuck with 1500 posts (which is a lot of the current, active userbase) can claim as much free shit as possible as long as they meet the very simple requirements and are in the right place at the right time.

Personally, I believe the requirements should either be more strict or there needs some sort of way to show who is a legitimate, high quality voucher (like Predator, Allura, etc). I think it would be easy enough to have an official list of users who have taken the vouch copy protocol to a much higher standard, perhaps a sticky in the marketplace or users services section? @Hova @Psychotic

Honestly, we could even make a rank for it but I think that would be a tad too far. There is a lot more that should go into a vouch copy than simply "oh, ya i got it good one". If you are getting a product worth several hundred dollars and the seller could provide it with ease, the review should reflect that fact. It most certainly needs to stem from good language arts and grammar, but as well as describe the process as a whole for other buyers.

tl;dr, vouch copy system needs a revamp.

What makes you think that Allura is HQ Voucher considering any other members on MPGH who are asking for vouch copies ?

Because he posts in general section a lot ?? He joined mpgh 5 months ago btw xdd so everyone says that shit oh you know at least 5 years on site should be added for receiving vouch copies.
He got 20+ posts per day lmao. Most of his posts are in general in giveaways. So idk but there much more marketbased users than him for example Dynasty or Kimchi

[[MPGH]Hennessy]

Tbh, some of this stuff is pretty new to me, but some of these vouchers can get super annoying.

There's clearly only a few known people for good business here at MPGH.

[swwrgaersghaedrgedrgherdhg]

I've never had any problems with those kids but it must suck. I don't think there are more than 10 shitty vouchers.

[Kyungrae]

Trol is always one of the first people to ask for a vouch copy.

[Cadized]

You forgot to mention @TheJoker, kid has email notifications for new threads and begs for free stuff on EVERY SINGLE THREAD.

[Trol553]

I've never had any problems with those kids but it must suck. I don't think there are more than 10 shitty vouchers.

Wait , wait , we are kids just because we take vouch copies ?

You forgot to mention @TheJoker, kid has email notifications for new threads and begs for free stuff on EVERY SINGLE THREAD.

I doubt he has that

Trol is always one of the first people to ask for a vouch copy.

At least I haven't got barred from MP

[Kyungrae]

Wait , wait , we are kids just because we take vouch copies ?



I doubt he has that



At least I haven't got barred from MP

At least i'm not a cheap cunt that asks for free shit.

[Raple]

What makes you think that Allura is HQ Voucher considering any other members on MPGH who are asking for vouch copies ?

Because he posts in general section a lot ?? He joined mpgh 5 months ago btw xdd so everyone says that shit oh you know at least 5 years on site should be added for receiving vouch copies.
He got 20+ posts per day lmao. Most of his posts are in general in giveaways. So idk but there much more marketbased users than him for example Dynasty or Kimchi

Was making standard examples, don't know if you noticed the et cetera but there are several more users than just 2 whom give high quality vouch copies.

Nobody said there should be a "5 year requirement". I simply believe the vouch copy system is blatantly abused. It seems you completely missed the point.

[Trol553]

At least i'm not a cheap cunt that asks for free shit.

Stolen shit ? You meant ?

- - - Updated - - -

Was making standard examples, don't know if you noticed the et cetera but there are several more users than just 2 whom give high quality vouch copies.

Nobody said there should be a "5 year requirement". I simply believe the vouch copy system is blatantly abused. It seems you completely missed the point.

I did not miss the point.

[Jumba]

I really agree with this thread. You see the same few greedy bastards out trying to get free shit. It's hard because if you designate a fixed number of vouchers that wouldn't work really. As they would be the only few who benefited.

Perhaps, each month all the users who wish to get vouches could be placed into a 'randomniser'. It would certainly create variety for sure.