well, a lot of people like it.
I personally don't (in fact, I even removed the black outline that every texture has (chars, items, objects, etc) and made it look like how textures looked when RotMG was just a little baby)
aka like this https://imgur.com/Fp9EWKB (old pic of realm, not my pserv, but that's obvious rofl)
Only glow i added to my server at all is character glow for 8/8 characters
not big/hard edits, but like everyone been saying, its the little changes that people like
- - - Updated - - -
pretty sure that's just 123.5.1 client that hes been working on for a while and just been adding necessary features to make it look like prods (tabs, stacks, etc)
Last edited by Riigged; 07-01-2018 at 09:49 AM.
Most likely the prod AS3 client (though even that is pretty obfuscated, but not so much), I doubt anyone would go through the pain of porting the features over to an older client
DevilRotMG (07-01-2018),lkdjnfoskjednfblksjdfn (07-01-2018)
What?
//10chars
- - - Updated - - -
This is not the 123.5.1 client. This is the 27.7.x2 AS3 client DECA released.
- - - Updated - - -
It's not though. The client has tons of bugs, it's heavily obfuscated. It's not very stable compared to new client sources, so working with it would be a waste of time.
- - - Updated - - -
I don't really think you know what you are talking about here. As far as I know from previous conversations with you, you barely know what the 123.5.1 client source is and what makes it such a unneeded client source theese days. Back before we had a new client source for a prod client, it was the most stable and most optimal client source to work with, not that it was a good source, but it was better than most others, and now the prod client sources we've gotten from deca has taken its place.
I do want to say, that I've thought and partially still do; that it is a nice source, and I've been working with it alot! I also know that Kithio and his team/friends spent alot of time getting it to work, so yeah, respect to them and the source, but it is not very optimal and defnitely not worth working with, in my oppinion (Atleast not if you are going for a vanilla build)
- - - Updated - - -
It is yes. It is the version 27.7.X2.
Me and my friend took the time to deobfuscate the entire client. You are right that it is a pain, since, the parts of the client that has remained obfuscated, is things such as local variables and undefined variables, that also gives you around 280-320 warnings on build/compiling.
We assigned all variables and refactored all the local variables. Things such as 'local_1' and '_arg_1'.
It's a pain, but its worth it
Last edited by lkdjnfoskjednfblksjdfn; 07-01-2018 at 05:28 PM.
nigga I can pull up 20 quotes right now from you saying how much you love the 123.5.1 source xD
that's why I assumed that's the source you were using lmao, you always talk ab it (or used to at least)
and i do know at one point you did add the features i mentioned to 123.5.1 source, pretty sure u did it to regnum with V and slend or whoever
Thanks. The most satisfying part, is when you are done with actually assigning variables, so you get 0 warnings on build. It builds hella lot faster and there is 0 warnings.
- - - Updated - - -
Yeah you could but it would end up as nonsense. Auto refactoring is very faulty (most times) and ends up giving variables names that makes no sense.
- - - Updated - - -
As I mentioned 123.5.1 was a good source of its time, and it is to respected due to the hard work that went into it. At the time I used it, it was the best client source available so yeah. You can pull up those quotes but it wouldn't change anything. 27.7.X2 is still what I use lol.
And no.... I never even implemented close to the same implementations as the 27.7.X2 client feature.
You must've been living under a rock if you think somebody is still doing vanilla servers witht he 123.5.1build client xD]
lmao I have been living under a rock because I myself am still using it D
pc broke forever ago (hence why I haven't posted in a looong time and then started posting again just recently) just came back and still goin old school bb
and u r telling me u didn't add skins, backpacks, stacks, etc. to Regnum with V and slender?? or am I tripping about that
lkdjnfoskjednfblksjdfn (07-03-2018)
Yes I guess you are. We added consumeable skins (not prod accurate), we did NOT add backpacks, neither 'Stacks' which I assume means the HP/MP potion tab slots. We had no prod accurate features added in after what comes with the initial source. The stat tabs was not accurate either. Not the right shape and the still had tooltips on the stattext. I think you should look up Regnum again, if this is what you remember.
Going a little bit off-topic, huh guys?
[Vouched] Filehost l VPN l Music l Streaming l Gaming l Education l Security l Torrent l Others [All Accounts Shop]
Educational Account Store [Chegg l Coursehero l Grammarly l Pluarsight l Udemy l Ect]
VPN Store [ExpressVPN l IPVanish l HideMyAss l VyerVPN l NordVPN l StrongVPN l Others]
90% of Torrent - Trackers Accounts l Invites l Service l Warranty
Just having a friendly talk about old days. Still rotmg, so it's not totally irelevant.
- - - Updated - - -
I understand. It was a great project, and it seemed very prod like at that time because we were all trying to get our server as prod accurate as possible :P Then FSoD released, and we all realised we werent even close.